Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Nov;7(11):170125.
doi: 10.1098/rsob.170125.

Statistical methods to detect pleiotropy in human complex traits

Affiliations
Review

Statistical methods to detect pleiotropy in human complex traits

Sophie Hackinger et al. Open Biol. 2017 Nov.

Abstract

In recent years pleiotropy, the phenomenon of one genetic locus influencing several traits, has become a widely researched field in human genetics. With the increasing availability of genome-wide association study summary statistics, as well as the establishment of deeply phenotyped sample collections, it is now possible to systematically assess the genetic overlap between multiple traits and diseases. In addition to increasing power to detect associated variants, multi-trait methods can also aid our understanding of how different disorders are aetiologically linked by highlighting relevant biological pathways. A plethora of available tools to perform such analyses exists, each with their own advantages and limitations. In this review, we outline some of the currently available methods to conduct multi-trait analyses. First, we briefly introduce the concept of pleiotropy and outline the current landscape of pleiotropy research in human genetics; second, we describe analytical considerations and analysis methods; finally, we discuss future directions for the field.

Keywords: genome-wide association study; pleiotropy; statistical methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Schematic representation of different scenarios for cross-phenotype associations. Such effects might arise due to biological pleiotropy, whereby causal variants for two traits colocalize in the same locus (a,b), due to mediated pleiotropy, whereby a variant exerts an effect on one trait through another one (c), or due to spurious pleiotropy, whereby causal variants for two traits fall into distinct loci but are in LD with a variant associated with both traits (d).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Directed acyclic graph of the Mendelian randomization model. IV, instrumental variable.

References

    1. Price AL, Spencer CCA, Donnelly P. 2015. Progress and promise in understanding the genetic basis of common diseases. Proc. R. Soc. B 282, 20151684 (doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.1684) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ozaki K, et al. 2002. Functional SNPs in the lymphotoxin-α gene that are associated with susceptibility to myocardial infarction. Nat. Genet. 32, 650–654. (doi:10.1038/ng1047) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Klein RJ. 2005. Complement factor H polymorphism in age-related macular degeneration. Science 308, 385–389. (doi:10.1126/science.1109557) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hirschhorn JN, Daly MJ. 2005. Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 95–108. (doi:10.1038/nrg1521) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stearns FW. 2010. One hundred years of pleiotropy: a retrospective. Genetics 186, 767–773. (doi:10.1534/genetics.110.122549) - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms