Improving Access to Cancer Treatments: The Role of Biosimilars
- PMID: 29094099
- PMCID: PMC5646904
- DOI: 10.1200/JGO.2016.008607
Improving Access to Cancer Treatments: The Role of Biosimilars
Abstract
Biologics play a key role in cancer treatment and are principal components of many therapeutic regimens. However, they require complex manufacturing processes, resulting in high cost and occasional shortages in supply. The cost of biologics limits accessibility of cancer treatment for many patients. Effective and affordable cancer therapies are needed globally, more so in developing countries, where health care resources can be limited. Biosimilars, which have biologic activity comparable to their corresponding reference drugs and are often more cost effective, have the potential to enhance treatment accessibility for patients and provide alternatives for decision makers (ie, prescribers, regulators, payers, policymakers, and drug developers). Impending patent expirations of several oncology biologics have opened up a vista for the development of corresponding biosimilars. Several countries have implemented abbreviated pathways for approval of biosimilars; however, challenges to their effective use persist. Some of these include designing appropriate clinical trials for assessing biosimilarity, extrapolation of indications, immunogenicity, interchangeability with the reference drug, lack of awareness and possibly acceptance among health care providers, and potential political barriers. In this review, we discuss the potential role and impact of biosimilars in oncology and the challenges related to their adoption and use. We also review the safety and efficacy of some of the widely used biosimilars in oncology and other therapeutic areas (eg, bevacizumab, darbepoetin, filgrastim, rituximab, and trastuzumab).
Conflict of interest statement
The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO’s conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/jco/site/ifc. Rakesh ChopraEmployment: Artemis Hospitals Honoraria: Cadila Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Adley Pharmaceuticals, Miracalus Pharmaceuticals, Biocon, Mylan Consulting or Advisory Role: Cadila Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Adley Pharmaceuticals, Miracalus Pharmaceuticals, Biocon, Mylan Speakers’ Bureau: Cadila Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Adley Pharmaceuticals, Miracalus Pharmaceuticals, Biocon, Mylan Research Funding: Dr Reddy's Laboratories, Samsung Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Emcure, Eisai, Pfizer, AlkemGilberto LopesHonoraria: AstraZeneca, Roche, Genentech, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Fresenius Kabi, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen-Cilag, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Cipla, Sanofi, Eisai, Eli Lilly Consulting or Advisory Role: Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, ImClone Research Funding: Eli Lilly, ImClone, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Eisai, Bristol-Myers Squibb Expert Testimony: Sanofi
Figures
References
-
- Abraham J. Developing oncology biosimilars: An essential approach for the future. Semin Oncol. 2013;40(suppl 1):S5–S24. - PubMed
-
- Zelenetz AD, Ahmed I, Braud EL, et al. NCCN biosimilars white paper: Regulatory, scientific, and patient safety perspectives. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2011;9(suppl 4):S1–S22. - PubMed
-
- Doloresco F, Fominaya C, Schumock GT, et al. Projecting future drug expenditures: 2011. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2011;68:921–932. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
