An assessment of the impact of pharmacogenomics on health disparities: a systematic literature review
- PMID: 29095091
- PMCID: PMC5694021
- DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2017-0076
An assessment of the impact of pharmacogenomics on health disparities: a systematic literature review
Abstract
This review assessed evidence of disparities in benefits of pharmacogenomics related to 'model performance' in subgroups of patients and studies which reported impact on health inequalities. 'Model performance' refers to the ability of algorithms including clinical, environmental and genetic information to guide treatment. A total of 4978 abstracts were screened by one reviewer and 30% (1494) were double screened by a second independent reviewer, after which data extraction was performed. Additional forward and backward citation searching of reference lists was conducted. Investigators independently double rated study quality and applicability of included studies. Only five individual studies were identified which met our inclusion criteria, but were contradictory in their conclusions. While three studies of genotype-guided dosing of warfarin reported that ethnic disparities in healthcare may widen, two other studies (one reporting on warfarin and reporting on clopidogrel) suggested that disparities in healthcare may reduce. There is a paucity of studies which evaluates the impact of pharmacogenomics on health disparities. Further work is required not only to evaluate health disparities between ethnic groups and countries but also within ethnic groups in the same country and solutions need to be identified to overcome these disparities.
Keywords: disparities; efficacy; equity; genetics; pharmacogenomics.
Conflict of interest statement
This study was supported by the NIH Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care North West Coast (NIHR CLAHRC NWC). The investigators were solely responsible for the content and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The funding source had no role in the selection, critical appraisal, or synthesis of evidence. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financialinvolvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.
No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.
Figures
References
-
- Whitehead M. The concepts and principles of equity and health. Health Promot. Int. 1991;6:217–228.
-
- EPEMED. Personalized Medicine in Europe – Enhancing Patient Access to Pharmaceutical Companion Products. European Personalized Medicine Association; 2014. www.epemed.org/online/www/content2/104/107/910/pagecontent2/4339/791/EN...
-
- Shargel L, Wu-Pong S, ABC Y. Applied Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics, 5th ed. McGraw-Hill; NY, USA: 2005. pp. 258–267.
-
- NIH. Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Program. 2016. www.nih.gov/precision-medicine-initiative-cohort-program
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous