Optimal extent of completion lymphadenectomy for patients with melanoma and a positive sentinel node in the groin
- PMID: 29095479
- PMCID: PMC5765473
- DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10644
Optimal extent of completion lymphadenectomy for patients with melanoma and a positive sentinel node in the groin
Abstract
Background: The optimal extent of groin completion lymph node dissection (CLND) (inguinal or ilioinguinal dissection) in patients with melanoma is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the extent of groin CLND after a positive sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is associated with improved outcome.
Methods: Data from all sentinel node-positive patients who underwent groin CLND at four tertiary melanoma referral centres were retrieved retrospectively. Baseline patient and tumour characteristics were collected for descriptive statistics, survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses.
Results: In total, 255 patients were included, of whom 137 (53·7 per cent) underwent inguinal dissection and 118 (46·3 per cent) ilioinguinal dissection. The overall CLND positivity rate was 18·8 per cent; the inguinal positivity rate was 15·5 per cent and the pelvic positivity rate was 9·3 per cent. The pattern of recurrence, and 5-year melanoma-specific survival, disease-free survival and distant-metastasis free survival rates were similar for both dissection types, even for patients with a positive CLND result. Cox regression analysis showed that type of CLND was not associated with disease-free or melanoma-specific survival.
Conclusion: There was no significant difference in recurrence pattern and survival rates between patients undergoing inguinal or ilioinguinal dissection after a positive SNB, even after stratification for a positive CLND result. An inguinal dissection is a safe first approach as CLND in patients with a positive SNB.
© 2017 The Authors. BJS published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.
Figures



References
-
- Garbe C, Peris K, Hauschild A, Saiag P, Middleton M, Bastholt L et al; European Dermatology Forum; European Association of Dermato‐Oncology; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Diagnosis and treatment of melanoma. European consensus‐based interdisciplinary guideline – update 2016. Eur J Cancer 2016; 63: 201–217. - PubMed
-
- Dutch Working Group on Melanoma . Melanoma Guideline 2012; 2013. http://www.oncoline.nl/uploaded/docs/melanoom/201208_vertaling%20Richtli... [accessed 9 March 2017].
-
- Coit DG, Thompson JA, Algazi A, Andtbacka R, Bichakjian CK, Carson WE III et al NCCN Guidelines insights: melanoma, version 3.2016. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2016; 14: 945–958. - PubMed
-
- Pasquali S, Spillane AJ, de Wilt JH, McCaffery K, Rossi CR, Quinn MJ et al Surgeons' opinions on lymphadenectomy in melanoma patients with positive sentinel nodes: a worldwide web‐based survey. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19: 4322–4329. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical