Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug:69:170-179.
doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2016.06.015. Epub 2016 Jun 23.

The Role of Response Styles in the Assessment of Intraindividual Personality Variability

Brendan M Baird  1 , Richard E Lucas  2 , M Brent Donnellan  3
Affiliations

The Role of Response Styles in the Assessment of Intraindividual Personality Variability

Brendan M Baird et al. J Res Pers. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Although personality psychologists often focus on between-person differences, understanding intraindividual variability is also a critical focus of the subdiscipline. Despite the fact that non-self-report techniques exist for assessing variability, questionnaire-based measures are still the norm. In two studies (N = 149 and N = 202) we examine the possibility that intraindividual variability measures derived from repeated self-report assessments are affected by certain response styles. These studies, which use a variety of techniques for assessing within-person variability, show that standard measures are moderately to strongly correlated with theoretically unrelated variability measures, including those based on ratings of satisfaction with neutral objects or the personality of cartoon characters. These results raise questions about the validity and utility of widely used measures for assessing intraindividual variability.

Keywords: emotions; measurement; personality; subjective well-being.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Austin EJ, Deary IJ, Egan V. Individual differences in response scale use: Mixed Rasch modelling of responses to NEO-FFI items. Personality and Individual Differences. 2006;40(6):1235–1245.
    1. Baird BM, Le K, Lucas RE. On the nature of intraindividual personality variability: reliability, validity, and associations with well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology. 2006;90(3):512–527. - PubMed
    1. Baird BM, Lucas RE. “… And How About Now?”: Effects of Item Redundancy on Contextualized Self-Reports of Personality. Journal of personality. 2011;79(5):1081–1112. - PubMed
    1. Bem SL, Lewis SA. Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of personality and Social Psychology. 1975;31(4):634.
    1. Berg IA. The reliability of extreme position response sets in two tests. The Journal of Psychology. 1953;36(1):3–9.