Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jan 12:2017:5612843.
doi: 10.1155/2017/5612843. eCollection 2017.

Currency and Competence of Occupational Therapists and Consumers with Rapidly Changing Technology

Affiliations
Review

Currency and Competence of Occupational Therapists and Consumers with Rapidly Changing Technology

Emily J Steel et al. Occup Ther Int. .

Abstract

Assistive technology was once a specialised field of practice, involving products designed for populations with specific impairments or functional goals. In Australia, occupational therapists have, at times, functioned as gatekeepers to public funding, prescribing products from a predefined list. An expanding range of accessible mainstream products available via international and online markets has changed the meaning and application of assistive technology for many people with disability. In the policy context of consumer choice and cost-effectiveness, have occupational therapists been left behind? This paper describes the change in context for access to assistive technology resulting in expanded possibilities for participation and inclusion. A case study of environmental control systems is used to explore the overlap of mainstream and assistive products and the funding and services to support their uptake. The analysis describes a future policy and practice context in which assistive technology includes a spectrum of products decoupled from access to independent advice and support services. A broader scope of occupational therapy practice has potential to enhance the occupational rights of people with disability and the efficiency and effectiveness of assistive technology provision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Smith R. O., Benge M. Using assistive technology to enable better living. In: Christiansen C. H., Matuska K. M., editors. Ways of Living: Adaptive Strategies for Special Needs. 3rd. Bethesda, Md, USA: American Occupational Therapy Association; 2004. pp. 397–421.
    1. Verdonck M., Steggles E., Nolan M., Chard G. Experiences of using an Environmental Control System (ECS) for persons with high cervical spinal cord injury: the interplay between hassle and engagement. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2014;9(1):70–78. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2013.823572. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ripat J. Function and impact of electronic aids to daily living for experienced users. Technology and Disability. 2006;18(2):79–87.
    1. Brandt Å., Samuelsson K., Töytäri O., Salminen A.-L. Activity and participation, quality of life and user satisfaction outcomes of environmental control systems and smart home technology: a systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2011;6(3):189–206. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2010.532286. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Palmer P., Seale J. Exploring the attitudes to environmental control systems of people with physical disabilities: a grounded theory approach. Technology and Disability. 2007;19(1):17–27.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources