Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 1;4(1):71-79.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3684.

Fiber Intake and Survival After Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis

Affiliations

Fiber Intake and Survival After Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis

Mingyang Song et al. JAMA Oncol. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Importance: Although high dietary fiber intake has been associated with a lower risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), it remains unknown whether fiber benefits CRC survivors.

Objective: To assess the association of postdiagnostic fiber intake with mortality.

Design, setting, and participants: A total of 1575 health care professionals with stage I to III CRC were evaluated in 2 prospective cohorts, Nurses' Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-up Study. Colorectal cancer-specific and overall mortality were determined after adjusting for other potential predictors for cancer survival. The study was conducted from December 23, 2016, to August 23, 2017.

Exposures: Consumption of total fiber and different sources of fiber and whole grains assessed by a validated food frequency questionnaire between 6 months and 4 years after CRC diagnosis.

Main outcomes and measures: Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs of CRC-specific and overall mortality after adjusting for other potential predictors for cancer survival.

Results: Of the 1575 participants, 963 (61.1%) were women; mean (SD) age was 68.6 (8.9) years. During a median of 8 years of follow-up, 773 deaths were documented, including 174 from CRC. High intake of total fiber after diagnosis was associated with lower mortality. The multivariable HR per each 5-g increment in intake per day was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.65-0.93; P = .006) for CRC-specific mortality and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.79-0.93; P < .001) for all-cause mortality. Patients who increased their fiber intake after diagnosis from levels before diagnosis had a lower mortality, and each 5-g/d increase in intake was associated with 18% lower CRC-specific mortality (95% CI, 7%-28%; P = .002) and 14% lower all-cause mortality (95% CI, 8%-19%; P < .001). According to the source of fiber, cereal fiber was associated with lower CRC-specific mortality (HR per 5-g/d increment, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50-0.90; P = .007) and all-cause mortality (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68-0.90; P < .001); vegetable fiber was associated with lower all-cause mortality (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72-0.96; P = .009) but not CRC-specific mortality (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.60-1.13; P = .22); no association was found for fruit fiber. Whole grain intake was associated with lower CRC-specific mortality (HR per 20-g/d increment, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88; P = .002), and this beneficial association was attenuated after adjusting for fiber intake (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.96; P = .02).

Conclusions and relevance: Higher fiber intake after the diagnosis of nonmetastatic CRC is associated with lower CRC-specific and overall mortality. Increasing fiber consumption after diagnosis may confer additional benefits to patients with CRC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No other conflict of interest exists.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Dose-response relationship between post-diagnostic fiber intake and colorectal cancer-specific mortality (A) and all-cause mortality (B) among colorectal cancer patients. Dashed lines represent the 95% confidence intervals of the hazard ratio (HR). Multivariable model was adjusted for the same set of covariates as in Table 1. For colorectal cancer-specific mortality, no spline variable was selected and P for linearity = 0.004; for all-cause mortality, there was a non-linear relationship with P = 0.007 for non-linearity and P<0.001 for the overall significance. Sample size within each interval of fiber intake (containing the lower limit but not the upper limit) is shown below the X-axis in panel (A). For example, there are 67 patients with fiber intake of ≤10 and >12.5 g/day. Twenty-five and 61 patients with fiber intake of <10 and ≥35 g/day are not shown, respectively.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Dose-response relationship between post-diagnostic fiber intake and colorectal cancer-specific mortality (A) and all-cause mortality (B) among colorectal cancer patients. Dashed lines represent the 95% confidence intervals of the hazard ratio (HR). Multivariable model was adjusted for the same set of covariates as in Table 1. For colorectal cancer-specific mortality, no spline variable was selected and P for linearity = 0.004; for all-cause mortality, there was a non-linear relationship with P = 0.007 for non-linearity and P<0.001 for the overall significance. Sample size within each interval of fiber intake (containing the lower limit but not the upper limit) is shown below the X-axis in panel (A). For example, there are 67 patients with fiber intake of ≤10 and >12.5 g/day. Twenty-five and 61 patients with fiber intake of <10 and ≥35 g/day are not shown, respectively.

Comment in

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2016;66(1):7–30. - PubMed
    1. Miller KD, Siegel RL, Lin CC, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2016;66(4):271–289. - PubMed
    1. Jones LW, Demark-Wahnefried W. Diet, exercise, and complementary therapies after primary treatment for cancer. The Lancet Oncology. 2006;7(12):1017–1026. - PubMed
    1. El-Shami K, Oeffinger KC, Erb NL, et al. American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Survivorship Care Guidelines. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2015;65(6):428–455. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rock CL, Doyle C, Demark-Wahnefried W, et al. Nutrition and physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2012;62(4):243–274. - PubMed