Low sensitivity of qSOFA, SIRS criteria and sepsis definition to identify infected patients at risk of complication in the prehospital setting and at the emergency department triage
- PMID: 29100549
- PMCID: PMC5670696
- DOI: 10.1186/s13049-017-0449-y
Low sensitivity of qSOFA, SIRS criteria and sepsis definition to identify infected patients at risk of complication in the prehospital setting and at the emergency department triage
Abstract
Background: Sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a host response to infection. The quick SOFA (qSOFA) score has been recently proposed as a new bedside clinical score to identify patients with suspected infection at risk of complication (intensive care unit (ICU) admission, in-hospital mortality). The aim of this study was to measure the sensitivity of the qSOFA score, SIRS criteria and sepsis definitions to identify the most serious sepsis cases in the prehospital setting and at the emergency department (ED) triage.
Methods: We performed a retrospective study of all patients transported by emergency medical services (EMS) to the Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) over twelve months. All patients with a suspected or proven infection after the ED workup were included. We retrospectively analysed the sensitivity of the qSOFA score (≥2 criteria), SIRS criteria (≥2 clinical criteria) and sepsis definition (SIRS criteria + one sign of organ dysfunction or hypoperfusion) in the pre-hospital setting and at the ED triage as predictors of ICU admission, ICU stay of ≥3 days and early (i.e. 48 h) mortality. No direct comparison between the three tools was attempted.
Results: Among 11,411 patients transported to the University hospital, 886 (7.8%) were included. In the pre-hospital setting, the sensitivity of qSOFA reached 36.3% for ICU admission, 17.4% for ICU stay of three days or more and 68.0% for 48 h mortality. The sensitivity of SIRS criteria reached 68.8% for ICU admission, 74.6% for ICU stay of three days or more and 64.0% for 48 h mortality. The sensitivity of sepsis definition did not reach 60% for any outcome. At ED triage, the sensitivity of qSOFA reached 31.2% for ICU admission, 30.5% for ICU stay of ≥3 days and 60.0% for mortality at 48 h. The sensitivity of SIRS criteria reached 58.8% for ICU admission, 57.6% for ICU stay of ≥3 days 80.0% for mortality at 48 h. The sensitivity of sepsis definition reached 60.0% for 48 h mortality.
Discussion: Incidence of sepsis in the ED among patients transported by ambulance was 3.8 percent. This rate, associated to the mortality of sepsis, confirms the necessity to dispose of a test to early identify those patients.
Conclusion: The sensitivity performance of all three tools was suboptimal. The qSOFA score, SIRS criteria and sepsis definition have low identification sensitivity in selecting septic patients in the pre-hospital setting or upon arrival in the ED at risk of complication.
Keywords: Emergency department; Prehospital care; Quick SOFA score; Sepsis; Septic shock; qSOFA.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the local Institutional Review and Ethics Boards of the University of Lausanne (Commission cantonale d’éthique de la recherche sur l’être humain (CER_VD), protocol 186/15). No authorisation from patients was required as ours was a retrospective study on de-identified lists of patients.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Poor performance of quick-SOFA (qSOFA) score in predicting severe sepsis and mortality - a prospective study of patients admitted with infection to the emergency department.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Jun 9;25(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0399-4. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017. PMID: 28599661 Free PMC article.
-
Triage of Septic Patients Using qSOFA Criteria at the SAMU Regulation: A Retrospective Analysis.Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018 Jan-Feb;22(1):84-90. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1347733. Epub 2017 Aug 9. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018. PMID: 28792256
-
Comparison of qSOFA and SIRS for predicting adverse outcomes of patients with suspicion of sepsis outside the intensive care unit.Crit Care. 2017 Mar 26;21(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1658-5. Crit Care. 2017. PMID: 28342442 Free PMC article.
-
Head-to-head comparison of qSOFA and SIRS criteria in predicting the mortality of infected patients in the emergency department: a meta-analysis.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Jul 11;26(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0527-9. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018. PMID: 29996880 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Accuracy of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria for predicting mortality in hospitalized patients with suspected infection: a meta-analysis of observational studies.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Nov;24(11):1123-1129. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.03.032. Epub 2018 Mar 29. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018. PMID: 29605565
Cited by
-
Understanding health care pathways of patients with sepsis: protocol of a mixed-methods analysis of health care utilization, experiences, and needs of patients with and after sepsis.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 8;24(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10509-4. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 38191398 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Prehospital Mobile Intensive Care Unit Intervention on Mortality of Patients with Sepsis.Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2019 Aug;47(4):334-341. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2019.26576. Epub 2019 Feb 21. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2019. PMID: 31380515 Free PMC article.
-
Early Management of Severe Biliary Infection in the Era of the Tokyo Guidelines.J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 16;12(14):4711. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144711. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37510826 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Quantitative capillary refill time predicts sepsis in patients with suspected infection in the emergency department: an observational study.J Intensive Care. 2019 May 6;7:29. doi: 10.1186/s40560-019-0382-4. eCollection 2019. J Intensive Care. 2019. PMID: 31080620 Free PMC article.
-
Raising concerns about the Sepsis-3 definitions.World J Emerg Surg. 2018 Jan 25;13:6. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0165-6. eCollection 2018. World J Emerg Surg. 2018. PMID: 29416555 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP, Fein AM, Knaus WA, Schein RM, Sibbald WJ. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM consensus conference committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest. 1992;101(6):1644–1655. doi: 10.1378/chest.101.6.1644. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Douglas IS, Jaeschke R, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(2):580–637. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Glickman SW, Cairns CB, Otero RM, Woods CW, Tsalik EL, Langley RJ, van Velkinburgh JC, Park LP, Glickman LT, Fowler VG, Jr, et al. Disease progression in hemodynamically stable patients presenting to the emergency department with sepsis. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(4):383–390. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00664.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical