Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Practice Guideline
. 2017 Nov;14(11S):S391-S405.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.08.045.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Liver Disease

Affiliations
Practice Guideline

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Liver Disease

Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal Imaging: et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Nov.

Abstract

Because liver fibrosis can be treated, it is important to diagnose liver fibrosis noninvasively and monitor response to treatment. Although ultrasound (grayscale and Doppler) can diagnose cirrhosis, it does so unreliably using morphologic and sonographic features and cannot diagnose the earlier, treatable stages of hepatic fibrosis. Transient elastography, ultrasound elastography with acoustic radiation force impulse, and MR elastography are modalities that can assess for hepatic fibrosis. Although all international organizations recommend ultrasound for screening for hepatocellular carcinoma, ultrasound is particularly limited for identifying hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with obesity, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and nodular cirrhotic livers. In these patient groups as well as patients who are on the liver transplant wait list, ultrasound is so limited that consideration can be made for screening for hepatocellular carcinoma with either MRI or multiphase CT. Additionally, patients who have been previously diagnosed with and treated for hepatocellular carcinoma require continued surveillance for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Keywords: AUC; Appropriate Use Criteria; Appropriateness Criteria; Cirrhosis; Elastography; Fibrosis; Hepatocellular Carcinoma; Liver disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

  • ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Liver Disease.
    Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal Imaging:; Horowitz JM, Kamel IR, Arif-Tiwari H, Asrani SK, Hindman NM, Kaur H, McNamara MM, Noto RB, Qayyum A, Lalani T. Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal Imaging:, et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 May;14(5S):S103-S117. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.011. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017. PMID: 28473066 Review.
  • ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Liver Disease.
    Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal Imaging; Bashir MR, Horowitz JM, Kamel IR, Arif-Tiwari H, Asrani SK, Chernyak V, Goldstein A, Grajo JR, Hindman NM, Kamaya A, McNamara MM, Porter KK, Solnes LB, Srivastava PK, Zaheer A, Carucci LR. Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal Imaging, et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 May;17(5S):S70-S80. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.01.023. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020. PMID: 32370979
  • ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Liver Metastases.
    Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal Imaging:; Kaur H, Hindman NM, Al-Refaie WB, Arif-Tiwari H, Cash BD, Chernyak V, Farrell J, Grajo JR, Horowitz JM, McNamara MM, Noto RB, Qayyum A, Lalani T, Kamel IR. Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal Imaging:, et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 May;14(5S):S314-S325. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.037. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017. PMID: 28473088 Review.
  • ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Staging of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.
    Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal Imaging:; Qayyum A, Tamm EP, Kamel IR, Allen PJ, Arif-Tiwari H, Chernyak V, Gonda TA, Grajo JR, Hindman NM, Horowitz JM, Kaur H, McNamara MM, Noto RB, Srivastava PK, Lalani T. Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal Imaging:, et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Nov;14(11S):S560-S569. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.08.050. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017. PMID: 29101993
  • ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Penetrating Neck Injury.
    Expert Panels on Neurologic and Vascular Imaging:; Schroeder JW, Ptak T, Corey AS, Ahmed O, Biffl WL, Brennan JA, Chandra A, Ginsburg M, Hanley M, Hunt CH, Johnson MM, Kennedy TA, Patel ND, Policeni B, Reitman C, Steigner ML, Stiver SI, Strax R, Whitehead MT, Dill KE. Expert Panels on Neurologic and Vascular Imaging:, et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Nov;14(11S):S500-S505. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.08.038. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017. PMID: 29101988

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources