Editorial Commentary: When a Tie Is Still a Win: Systematic Reviews Showing No Difference Between Treatments May Not Be Generalizable to Individual Patients
- PMID: 29102020
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.275
Editorial Commentary: When a Tie Is Still a Win: Systematic Reviews Showing No Difference Between Treatments May Not Be Generalizable to Individual Patients
Abstract
When a systematic review finds no difference between treatment options for a particular disorder, this could mean more than you think. Individual patients requiring shoulder Bankart repair are unique with respect to their demands and expectations and pathology. Surgeons should combine published principles with understanding of their own skills and their specific patient to optimize a treatment outcome.
Copyright © 2017 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment on
-
Recurrent Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Surgical Technical Factors.Arthroscopy. 2017 Nov;33(11):2081-2092. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.06.038. Epub 2017 Aug 31. Arthroscopy. 2017. PMID: 28866342
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
