Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Nov 4;19(12):133.
doi: 10.1007/s11886-017-0934-y.

Evaluation of a Heart Transplant Candidate

Affiliations
Review

Evaluation of a Heart Transplant Candidate

Sook Jin Lee et al. Curr Cardiol Rep. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: Heart transplantation is the best option for irreversible and critically advanced heart failure. However, limited donor pool, the risk of rejection, infection, and right ventricular dysfunction in short-term post-transplant period, as well as, the development of coronary allograft vasculopathy and malignancy in the long-term post-transplant period limits the utility of heart transplantation for all comers with advanced heart failure. Therefore, selection of appropriate candidates is very important for the best short and long-term prognosis. In this article, we discuss the principles of selection of candidates and compare to the recently updated International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) listing criteria with the goal of updating current clinical practice.

Recent findings: We found that while most of the recommendations in the new listing criteria are continuous with the previous criteria, updated recommendations are made on the risk stratification models in choosing transplantation candidates. Recommendation on hepatic dysfunction is not directly included in the updated ISHLT listing criteria; however, adoption of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and modified MELD scores in the evaluation of risk are suggested in recent studies. In conclusion, evaluation of patient selection for heart transplantation should be comprehensive and individualized with respect to indications and the risk of comorbidities of candidates. With the advancement of mechanical circulatory support (MCS), the selection of heart transplantation candidate is continuously evolving and widened. MCS as bridge to candidacy should be considered when the candidate has potentially reversible risk factors for transplantation.

Keywords: Advanced heart failure; Heart failure risk model; Heart transplantation; Liver dysfunction; Pulmonary hypertension; Renal dysfunction.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Nov;42(5):864-9; discussion 869-70 - PubMed
    1. Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jul 1;118(1):132-7 - PubMed
    1. Clin Infect Dis. 2009 May 1;48(9):1276-84 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Heart Fail. 2003 Oct;5(5):645-53 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 2008 Sep 30;118(14 Suppl):S83-8 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources