Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul 27;2(2):e000365.
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000365. eCollection 2017.

Postnatal gestational age estimation using newborn screening blood spots: a proposed validation protocol

Affiliations

Postnatal gestational age estimation using newborn screening blood spots: a proposed validation protocol

Malia S Q Murphy et al. BMJ Glob Health. .

Abstract

Background: Knowledge of gestational age (GA) is critical for guiding neonatal care and quantifying regional burdens of preterm birth. In settings where access to ultrasound dating is limited, postnatal estimates are frequently used despite the issues of accuracy associated with postnatal approaches. Newborn metabolic profiles are known to vary by severity of preterm birth. Recent work by our group and others has highlighted the accuracy of postnatal GA estimation algorithms derived from routinely collected newborn screening profiles. This protocol outlines the validation of a GA model originally developed in a North American cohort among international newborn cohorts.

Methods: Our primary objective is to use blood spot samples collected from infants born in Zambia and Bangladesh to evaluate our algorithm's capacity to correctly classify GA within 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks. Secondary objectives are to 1) determine the algorithm's accuracy in small-for-gestational-age and large-for-gestational-age infants, 2) determine its ability to correctly discriminate GA of newborns across dichotomous thresholds of preterm birth (≤34 weeks, <37 weeks GA) and 3) compare the relative performance of algorithms derived from newborn screening panels including all available analytes and those restricted to analyte subsets. The study population will consist of infants born to mothers already enrolled in one of two preterm birth cohorts in Lusaka, Zambia, and Matlab, Bangladesh. Dried blood spot samples will be collected and sent for analysis in Ontario, Canada, for model validation.

Discussion: This study will determine the validity of a GA estimation algorithm across ethnically diverse infant populations and assess population specific variations in newborn metabolic profiles.

Keywords: epidemiology; gestational age; metabolomics; newborn screening; obstetrics; screening; validation study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proposed study workflow. Samples accrued from collection sites in Zambia and Bangladesh will be sent via preferred courier services for analysis at Newborn Screening Ontario (NSO) in Ontario, Canada. Reporting procedures from Ontario, Canada, to the collection sites will include provision of reports on sample quality, on newborns at risk of congenital hypothyroidism (CH), medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (MCADD) and haemoglobinopathies (HGBs), as well as quarterly reports summarising study progress.

References

    1. Lee AC, Mullany LC, Ladhani K, et al. . Validity of newborn clinical assessment to determine gestational age in Bangladesh. Pediatrics 2016;138:e20153303 10.1542/peds.2015-3303 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Quinn JA, Munoz FM, Gonik B, et al. . Preterm birth: case definition & guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunisation safety data. Vaccine 2016;34:6047–56. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.03.045 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Neufeld LM, Haas JD, Grajéda R, et al. . Last menstrual period provides the best estimate of gestation length for women in rural Guatemala. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2006;20:290–8. 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2006.00741.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buekens P, Delvoye P, Wollast E, et al. . Epidemiology of pregnancies with unknown last menstrual period. J Epidemiol Community Health 1984;38:79–80. 10.1136/jech.38.1.79 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hall MH, Carr-Hill RA, Fraser C, et al. . The extent and antecedents of uncertain gestation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985;92:445–51. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1985.tb01347.x - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources