Scientism, conflicts of interest, and the marginalization of ethics in medical education
- PMID: 29105237
- DOI: 10.1111/jep.12843
Scientism, conflicts of interest, and the marginalization of ethics in medical education
Abstract
Aim: This paper reports on the findings from 6 focus groups conducted with Australian medical students. The focus groups sought students' perspectives on how the influence of commercial interests on medical practice and education could be managed.
Method: We conducted 6 focus groups with medical students in New South Wales, Australia. Participants were recruited via student-run medical society and faculty e-mail lists. Forty-nine students from 6 medical schools in New South Wales participated. The research team reflected on the extent to which students uncritically appealed to science in the abstract as a management solution for conflicts of interest. Data analysis was largely inductive, looking for uses of scientific terminology, EBM, and appeals to "science" in the management of COI and applied theoretical analyses of scientism.
Results: The students in our study suggested that science and evidence-based medicine, rather than ethics or professionalism, were the best tools to deal with undue influence and bias. This paper uses philosophy of science literature to critically examine these scientistic appeals to science and EBM as a means of managing the influence of pharmaceutical reps and commercial interests. We argue that a scientistic style of reasoning is reinforced through medical curricula and that students need to be made aware of the epistemological assumptions that underpin science, medicine, and EBM to address the ethical challenges associated with commercialised health care.
Conclusion: More work is needed to structure medical curricula to reflect the complexities of practice and realities of science. However, curricula change alone will not sufficiently address issues associated with commercial interests in medicine. For real change to occur, there needs to be a broader social and professional debate about the ways in which medicine and industry interact, and structural changes that restrict or mitigate commercial influences in educational, research, and policy settings.
Keywords: epistemology; evidence-based medicine; medical education; medical ethics; practical reasoning; science.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Developing a bioethics curriculum for medical students from divergent geo-political regions.BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jul 27;16:193. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0711-4. BMC Med Educ. 2016. PMID: 27461194 Free PMC article.
-
A Troubled Solution: Medical Student Struggles with Evidence and Industry Bias.Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Dec;21(6):1673-89. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9623-z. Epub 2014 Dec 18. Sci Eng Ethics. 2015. PMID: 25520258
-
Moving beyond the theoretical: Medical students' desire for practical, role-specific ethics training.AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2018 Jul-Sep;9(3):154-163. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1472149. Epub 2018 Jul 6. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2018. PMID: 29727598
-
Medical ethics education: where are we? Where should we be going? A review.Acad Med. 2005 Dec;80(12):1143-52. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200512000-00020. Acad Med. 2005. PMID: 16306292 Review.
-
Teaching health care ethics: why we should teach nursing and medical students together.Nurs Ethics. 2005 Mar;12(2):167-76. doi: 10.1191/0969733005ne773oa. Nurs Ethics. 2005. PMID: 15791786 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources