Reply to Vazquez Guillamet et al. and to Magnussen et al.: "Normalization of FEV1/FVC Ratio to Greater Than 0.7 Does Not Equal Resolution of Disease" and "Spirometry Variability Must Be Critically Interpreted before Negating a Clinical Diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease"
- PMID: 29106294
- DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201710-1994LE
Reply to Vazquez Guillamet et al. and to Magnussen et al.: "Normalization of FEV1/FVC Ratio to Greater Than 0.7 Does Not Equal Resolution of Disease" and "Spirometry Variability Must Be Critically Interpreted before Negating a Clinical Diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease"
Comment on
-
Diagnostic Instability and Reversals of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Diagnosis in Individuals with Mild to Moderate Airflow Obstruction.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Aug 1;196(3):306-314. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201612-2531OC. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017. PMID: 28267373
-
Normalization of FEV1/FVC Ratio to Greater Than 0.7 Does Not Equal Resolution of Disease.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Mar 15;197(6):834-835. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201708-1693LE. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018. PMID: 29106290 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Spirometry Variability Must Be Critically Interpreted before Negating a Clinical Diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Mar 15;197(6):835-836. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201709-1815LE. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018. PMID: 29106291 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical