Routine haemostasis testing before transplanted kidney biopsy: a cohort study

Abstract

Kidney biopsy can result in bleeding complications. Prebiopsy testing using bleeding time (BT) is controversial. New whole blood haemostasis tests, such as platelet function analyser-100 (PFA-100) and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA), might perform better. We postulated that PFA-100 would be suitable to replace BT prebiopsy. In 154 patients, transplanted kidney biopsies were performed after measurement of bleeding time, PFA-100, MEA and mean platelet volume (MPV). Bleeding outcome (haemoglobin (Hb) drop, haematuria (±bladder catheterization), ultrasound finding of a bleeding, need for (non)surgical intervention and/or transfusion) after the biopsy was correlated to each test. Male-female ratio was 2:1. 50% had a surveillance biopsy at either three or 12 months. Around 17% (had) used acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) prebiopsy. Of 17 bleeding events, one subject needed a transfusion. Most bleeding events were Hb reductions over 1 mmol/l and all resolved uneventful. BT, PFA-100, MEA and MPV did not predict a bleeding outcome; prior ASA use however could (odds ratio 3.19; 95%-CI 1.06 to 9.61). Diagnostic performance data and Bland-Altman analysis showed that BT could not be substituted by PFA-100. ASA use was the best determinant of bleeding after kidney biopsy. Routine haemostasis testing prebiopsy has no added value.

Keywords: coagulation; kidney biopsy; platelet function; point-of-care; screening.