Lopinavir plus nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors, lopinavir plus raltegravir, or lopinavir monotherapy for second-line treatment of HIV (EARNEST): 144-week follow-up results from a randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 29108797
- PMCID: PMC5739875
- DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30630-8
Lopinavir plus nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors, lopinavir plus raltegravir, or lopinavir monotherapy for second-line treatment of HIV (EARNEST): 144-week follow-up results from a randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Millions of HIV-infected people worldwide receive antiretroviral therapy (ART) in programmes using WHO-recommended standardised regimens. Recent WHO guidelines recommend a boosted protease inhibitor plus raltegravir as an alternative second-line combination. We assessed whether this treatment option offers any advantage over the standard protease inhibitor plus two nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) second-line combination after 144 weeks of follow-up in typical programme settings.
Methods: We analysed the 144-week outcomes at the completion of the EARNEST trial, a randomised controlled trial done in HIV-infected adults or adolescents in 14 sites in five sub-Saharan African countries (Uganda, Zimbabwe, Malawi, Kenya, Zambia). Participants were those who were no longer responding to non-NRTI-based first-line ART, as assessed with WHO criteria, confirmed by viral-load testing. Participants were randomly assigned to receive a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (lopinavir 400 mg with ritonavir 100 mg, twice per day) plus two or three clinician-selected NRTIs (protease inhibitor plus NRTI group), protease inhibitor plus raltegravir (400 mg twice per day; protease inhibitor plus raltegravir group), or protease inhibitor monotherapy (plus raltegravir induction for first 12 weeks, re-intensified to combination therapy after week 96; protease inhibitor monotherapy group). Randomisation was by computer-generated randomisation sequence, with variable block size. The primary outcome was viral load of less than 400 copies per mL at week 144, for which we assessed non-inferiority with a one-sided α of 0·025, and superiority with a two-sided α of 0·025. The EARNEST trial is registered with ISRCTN, number 37737787.
Findings: Between April 12, 2010, and April 29, 2011, 1837 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 1277 patients were randomly assigned to an intervention group. In the primary (complete-case) analysis at 144 weeks, 317 (86%) of 367 in the protease inhibitor plus NRTI group had viral loads of less than 400 copies per mL compared with 312 (81%) of 383 in the protease inhibitor plus raltegravir group (p=0·07; lower 95% confidence limit for difference 10·2% vs specified non-inferiority margin 10%). In the protease inhibitor monotherapy group, 292 (78%) of 375 had viral loads of less than 400 copies per mL; p=0·003 versus the protease inhibitor plus NRTI group at 144 weeks. There was no difference between groups in serious adverse events, grade 3 or 4 adverse events (total or ART-related), or events that resulted in treatment modification.
Interpretation: Protease inhibitor plus raltegravir offered no advantage over protease inhibitor plus NRTI in virological efficacy or safety. In the primary analysis, protease inhibitor plus raltegravir did not meet non-inferiority criteria. A regimen of protease inhibitor with NRTIs remains the best standardised second-line regimen for use in programmes in resource-limited settings.
Funding: European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP), UK Medical Research Council, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Irish Aid, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, Instituto Superiore di Sanita, Merck, ViiV Healthcare, WHO.
Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Figures



Comment in
-
The unexpected success of NRTIs in second-line treatment.Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Jan;18(1):3-5. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30631-X. Epub 2017 Nov 3. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018. PMID: 29108798 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Raltegravir in second-line antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings (SELECT): a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority study.Lancet HIV. 2016 Jun;3(6):e247-58. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(16)30011-X. Epub 2016 Apr 18. Lancet HIV. 2016. PMID: 27240787 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor cross-resistance and outcomes from second-line antiretroviral therapy in the public health approach: an observational analysis within the randomised, open-label, EARNEST trial.Lancet HIV. 2017 Aug;4(8):e341-e348. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(17)30065-6. Epub 2017 May 8. Lancet HIV. 2017. PMID: 28495562 Free PMC article.
-
Body composition and metabolic outcomes after 96 weeks of treatment with ritonavir-boosted lopinavir plus either nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors or raltegravir in patients with HIV with virological failure of a standard first-line antiretroviral therapy regimen: a substudy of the randomised, open-label, non-inferiority SECOND-LINE study.Lancet HIV. 2017 Jan;4(1):e13-e20. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(16)30189-8. Epub 2016 Nov 1. Lancet HIV. 2017. PMID: 27815068 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative efficacy and safety of second-line antiretroviral therapy for treatment of HIV/AIDS: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Lancet HIV. 2017 Oct;4(10):e433-e441. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(17)30109-1. Epub 2017 Aug 4. Lancet HIV. 2017. PMID: 28784426
-
[Lopinavir/ritonavir in new initial antiretroviral treatment strategies].Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2014 Nov;32 Suppl 3:7-11. doi: 10.1016/S0213-005X(14)70161-2. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2014. PMID: 25542869 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
AntiRetroviral Therapy In Second-line: investigating Tenofovir-lamivudine-dolutegravir (ARTIST): protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Feb 17;6:33. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16597.1. eCollection 2021. Wellcome Open Res. 2021. PMID: 36017341 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes and characteristics of patients on protease inhibitors at a tertiary level antiretroviral clinic.South Afr J HIV Med. 2023 Dec 21;24(1):1536. doi: 10.4102/sajhivmed.v24i1.1536. eCollection 2023. South Afr J HIV Med. 2023. PMID: 38222309 Free PMC article.
-
The management of treatment-experienced HIV patients (including virologic failure and switches).Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2020 Jan 20;7:2049936120901395. doi: 10.1177/2049936120901395. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec. Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2020. PMID: 32010443 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Virologic efficacy of tenofovir, lamivudine and dolutegravir as second-line antiretroviral therapy in adults failing a tenofovir-based first-line regimen.AIDS. 2021 Jul 15;35(9):1423-1432. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002936. AIDS. 2021. PMID: 33973876 Free PMC article.
-
Initial Supplementary Dose of Dolutegravir in Second-Line Antiretroviral Therapy: A Noncomparative, Double-Blind, Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.Clin Infect Dis. 2023 May 24;76(10):1832-1840. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad023. Clin Infect Dis. 2023. PMID: 36645792 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Gilks CF, Crowley S, Ekpini R. The WHO public-health approach to antiretroviral treatment against HIV in resource-limited settings. Lancet. 2006;368:505–510. - PubMed
-
- WHO . World Health Organization; Geneva: 2016. Consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection: recommendations for a public health approach. - PubMed
-
- Paton NI, Kityo C, Hoppe A. Assessment of second-line antiretroviral regimens for HIV therapy in Africa. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:234–247. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous