Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Dec;21(12):3440-3456.
doi: 10.1007/s10461-017-1960-x.

Punto Seguro: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Using Conditional Economic Incentives to Reduce Sexually Transmitted Infection Risks in Mexico

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Punto Seguro: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Using Conditional Economic Incentives to Reduce Sexually Transmitted Infection Risks in Mexico

Omar Galárraga et al. AIDS Behav. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Randomized controlled pilot evaluated effect of conditional economic incentives (CEIs) on number of sex partners, condom use, and incident sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among male sex workers in Mexico City. Incentives were contingent on testing free of new curable STIs and/or clinic attendance. We assessed outcomes for n = 227 participants at 6 and 12 months (during active phase with incentives), and then at 18 months (with incentives removed). We used intention-to-treat and inverse probability weighting for the analysis. During active phase, CEIs increased clinic visits (10-13 percentage points) and increased condom use (10-15 percentage points) for CEI groups relative to controls. The effect on condom use was not sustained once CEIs were removed. CEIs did not have an effect on number of partners or incident STIs. Conditional incentives for male sex workers can increase linkage to care and retention and reduce some HIV/STI risks such as condomless sex, while incentives are in place.

Keywords: Conditional cash transfers; Conditional economic incentives; HIV prevention; Male sex workers; Mexico; Sexually transmitted infections prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow of Study Participants

References

    1. Fiszbein A, Schady NR, Ferreira FHG. Conditional cash transfers : reducing present and future poverty. Washington D.C.: World Bank; 2009.
    1. Baird S, Chirwa E, McIntosh C, Ozler B. The Short-Term Impacts of a Schooling Conditional Cash Transfer Program on the Sexual Behavior of Young Women. Health Econ. 2010 Sep;19:55–68. - PubMed
    1. Baird S, McIntosh C, Ozler B. Cash or Condition? Evidence from a Cash Transfer Experiment. Q J Econ. 2011 Nov;126(4):1709–1753.
    1. Baird S, de Hoop J, Ozler B. Income Shocks and Adolescent Mental Health. J Hum Resour. 2013 Spr;48(2):370–403.
    1. Higgins ST. Comments on contingency management and conditional cash transfers. Health Econ. 2009 Aug 7; - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources