Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 6;17(1):702.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2649-6.

Variability in market uptake of psychotropic medications in Europe reflects cultural diversity

Affiliations

Variability in market uptake of psychotropic medications in Europe reflects cultural diversity

J M Hoebert et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: In the last 20-30 years, many international studies have found substantial differences in the use of (older) psychotropic medication between European countries. The majority mentioned an important role for attitudes and beliefs towards psychotropic medication. So far, no studies have looked into the effects of cultural diversity on the use of new medications entering the market. As national cultures relate deeply to held values regarding, for example, what is seen as effective versus ineffective or safe versus dangerous, (cultural) diversity in decision making around the role of new medications in clinical practice may already be expected from the first day after market authorization.

Methods: This study examined the relation between cultural diversity, described in Hofstede's model of cultural dimensions (Power Distance, Individualism, Masculinity, Uncertainty Avoidance, Indulgence and Long-Term Orientation) and utilization of three new psychotropic medications, namely aripiprazole, duloxetine and pregabalin in Europe. Country level sales data of the case study medications were correlated to country-specific scores of Hofstede's cultural dimensions. IMS Health's MIDAS database has been used for sales data (converted to Defined Daily Doses/1000 inhabitants/day) for the case study medications from the market authorization date in 2004 until December 2009 for 23 EU member states.

Results: Consumption of the case study medications was seen in all countries. In general, pregabalin was used more often than aripiprazole and duloxetine. In 2 years after market authorization, approximately 80% of all countries have reported use of all three molecules. Correlations between Hofstede dimensions individualism, long-term orientation and indulgence and total use of the case study medications tended to become stronger over time, but they were only statistically significant for indulgence at two years after market authorization (rho = 0.51, p = 0.014) and three years after market authorization (rho = 0.54, p = 0.008). A more detailed analysis showed (slight) variation by molecule.

Conclusions: This study is a first step in including cultural dimensions when explaining cross-national variation in the use of new medications. The results indicate that indulgence, however marginally, is a cultural aspect that relates to the utilization of new psychotropic medications, suggesting that within the cultural context, less regulation of social norms is a main factor in explaining cross-national variation in uptake of these medications.

Keywords: Cultural diversity; European Union; Hofstede dimensions; Psychotropic medications; Utilization; Variation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

According to Dutch law, ethics approval was not applicable and consent to participate was not required because the study does not subject persons to treatment or require persons to follow a certain behavioral strategy nor involves handling of patient data (Medical Research (Human Subjects) Act). We have added this to the method section.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None declared. The department of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, has received unrestricted research funding from the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMW), the National Health Care Insurance Board (ZiN), the Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association (KNMP), the private-public funded Top Institute Pharma (http://www.tipharma.com/home/, includes co-funding from universities, government, and industry), the EU Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI), EU 7th Framework Program (FP7), the Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board, the Dutch Ministry of Health and industry (including GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, and others). LvD has received unrestricted grants from GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Astra Zeneca for studies not related to this study.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Adoption curve of the three case study medications included in the present study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a Correlations between aripiprazole and Hofstede dimensions over time. Marked dots show statistically significant correlations. PDI = power distance, IDV = Individualism, MAS = masculinity, UAI = uncertainty avoidance, LTO = long-term orientation, IVR = indulgence. b Correlations between duloxetine and Hofstede dimensions over time. Marked dots show statistically significant correlations. PDI = power distance, IDV = Individualism, MAS = masculinity, UAI = uncertainty avoidance, LTO = long-term orientation, IVR = indulgence. c Correlations between pregabalin and Hofstede dimensions over time. Marked dots show statistically significant correlations. PDI = power distance, IDV = Individualism, MAS = masculinity, UAI = uncertainty avoidance, LTO = long-term orientation, IVR = indulgence

References

    1. Jervis N. What is a culture? World Communities, The State Education Department.New York: The University of the State of New York. 2006.
    1. Fabrega H. The role of culture in a theory of psychiatric illness. Soc Sci Med. 1992;35(1):91–103. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90122-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sachs L, Tomson G. Medicines and culture - a double perspective on drug utilization in a developing country. Soc Sci Med. 1992;34(3):307–315. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90272-R. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Payer L. Medicine and culture: varieties of treatment in the United States, England, West Germany and France. First ed. New York: Henry Holt and Compane, LLC; 1996.
    1. Nolte E, Newbould J, Conklin A. International variation in the usage of medicines: a review of the literature. Santa Monica/London: RAND Corporation & London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medication; 2010. - PMC - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources