Suicide Acceptability and Sexual Orientation: Results from the General Social Survey 2008-2014
- PMID: 29111903
- PMCID: PMC6169791
- DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2017.1377132
Suicide Acceptability and Sexual Orientation: Results from the General Social Survey 2008-2014
Abstract
Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) individuals have higher prevalence of lifetime suicide ideation and attempt than their heterosexual peers, but less is known about differences in suicide acceptability (i.e., believing suicide is a viable answer to a problem). The purpose of this study was to examine if LGB adults had greater suicide acceptability than heterosexual adults. A total of 4 items in the General Social Surveys from 2008 to 2014 assessed whether a nationally representative sample of U.S. adult respondents (n = 5,037) thought it acceptable for individuals to kill themselves if one: goes bankrupt, dishonors their family, is tired of living, or has an incurable disease. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association of sexual orientation with suicide acceptability items after adjusting for confounding factors. Compared with heterosexuals, lesbians/gays had higher odds of reporting suicide acceptability if one goes bankrupt (OR = 1.92; 95% CI: 1.06, 3.46), dishonors family (OR = 1.83; 95% CI: 1.01, 3.28), or is tired of living (OR = 2.25; 95% CI: 1.30, 3.90). Bisexual and heterosexual groups were largely similar across the 4 suicide acceptability items. No sexual orientation differences were observed for reporting acceptability of suicide in the instance of an incurable disease. Post hoc analyses revealed significant interactions between sex and sexual orientation, such that differences in suicide acceptability seemed to be driven by sexual minority women rather than by sexual minority men. Suicide acceptability differs by sexual orientation, and community-level interventions around changing norms about suicide may be a prevention strategy for sexual minority individuals.
Keywords: general social survey; sexual minority; sexual orientation; suicide acceptability.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Bohan JS, Russell GM, & Montgomery S (2003). Gay youth and gay adults: Bridging the generation gap. Journal of homosexuality, 44(1), 15–41. - PubMed
-
- Cato JE, & Canetto SS (2003). Young Adults’ Reactions to Gay and Lesbian Peers Who Became Suicidal Following “Coming Out” to their Parents. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 33(2), 201–210. - PubMed
-
- Chu JP, Goldblum P, Floyd R, & Bongar B (2010). The cultural theory and model of suicide. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 14(1), 25–40.
-
- Cialdini RB, Kallgren CA, & Reno RR (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in experimental social psychology, 24, 201–234.
-
- Cohler BJ, & Hammack PL (2007). The psychological world of the gay teenager: Social change, narrative, and “normality”. Journal of youth and adolescence, 36(1), 47–59.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical