Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov;17(11):31-39.
doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1378753.

Empowerment Failure: How Shortcomings in Physician Communication Unwittingly Undermine Patient Autonomy

Affiliations

Empowerment Failure: How Shortcomings in Physician Communication Unwittingly Undermine Patient Autonomy

Peter A Ubel et al. Am J Bioeth. 2017 Nov.

Abstract

Many health care decisions depend not only upon medical facts, but also on value judgments-patient goals and preferences. Until recent decades, patients relied on doctors to tell them what to do. Then ethicists and others convinced clinicians to adopt a paradigm shift in medical practice, to recognize patient autonomy, by orienting decision making toward the unique goals of individual patients. Unfortunately, current medical practice often falls short of empowering patients. In this article, we reflect on whether the current state of medical decision making effectively promotes patients' health care goals. We base our reflections, in part, on research in which we observed physicians making earnest efforts to partner with patients in making treatment decisions, but still struggling to empower patients-failing to communicate clearly to patients about decision-relevant information, overwhelming patients with irrelevant information, overlooking when patients' emotions made it hard to engage in choices, and making recommendations before discussing patients' goals.

Keywords: autonomy; informed consent; physician/patient communication; shared decision making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Andrade EB, and Ariely D. 2009. The enduring impact of transient emotions on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 109:1–8. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.02.003. - DOI
    1. Beauchamp TL, and Childress JF. 2006. Principles of biomedical ethics, 6th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    1. Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Garmo H, et al. 2014. Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 370:932–42. 10.1056/NEJMoa1311593. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cain DM, Loewenstein G, and Moore DA. 2005. The dirt on coming clean: Perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. Journal of Legal Studies 34:1–25. 10.1086/426699. - DOI
    1. Charles C, Gafni A, and Whelan T. 1997. Shared decision making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Social Science and Medicine 44:681–92. 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00221-3. - DOI - PubMed