Empowerment Failure: How Shortcomings in Physician Communication Unwittingly Undermine Patient Autonomy
- PMID: 29111936
- PMCID: PMC6312722
- DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1378753
Empowerment Failure: How Shortcomings in Physician Communication Unwittingly Undermine Patient Autonomy
Abstract
Many health care decisions depend not only upon medical facts, but also on value judgments-patient goals and preferences. Until recent decades, patients relied on doctors to tell them what to do. Then ethicists and others convinced clinicians to adopt a paradigm shift in medical practice, to recognize patient autonomy, by orienting decision making toward the unique goals of individual patients. Unfortunately, current medical practice often falls short of empowering patients. In this article, we reflect on whether the current state of medical decision making effectively promotes patients' health care goals. We base our reflections, in part, on research in which we observed physicians making earnest efforts to partner with patients in making treatment decisions, but still struggling to empower patients-failing to communicate clearly to patients about decision-relevant information, overwhelming patients with irrelevant information, overlooking when patients' emotions made it hard to engage in choices, and making recommendations before discussing patients' goals.
Keywords: autonomy; informed consent; physician/patient communication; shared decision making.
Comment in
-
Informed Consent Is Inadequate and Shared Decision Making Is Ineffective: Arguing for the Primacy of Authenticity in Decision-Making Paradigms.Am J Bioeth. 2017 Nov;17(11):45-47. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1378759. Am J Bioeth. 2017. PMID: 29111926 No abstract available.
-
Health Communication: Not Just Autonomy, Also Justice.Am J Bioeth. 2017 Nov;17(11):49. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1378757. Am J Bioeth. 2017. PMID: 29111928 No abstract available.
-
Autonomy, Information, and Paternalism in Clinical Communication.Am J Bioeth. 2017 Nov;17(11):50-52. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1378769. Am J Bioeth. 2017. PMID: 29111929 No abstract available.
-
Communication Education, Modeling, and Protocols Transform Clinicians to Agents of Empowerment.Am J Bioeth. 2017 Nov;17(11):40-42. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1378764. Am J Bioeth. 2017. PMID: 29111935 No abstract available.
-
Sowing the SEED for Patient Empowerment.Am J Bioeth. 2017 Nov;17(11):42-45. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1378762. Am J Bioeth. 2017. PMID: 29111939 No abstract available.
-
Medical Culture's Bias to Actively Intervene Can Undermine Patient Empowerment and Welfare.Am J Bioeth. 2017 Nov;17(11):47-48. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1378763. Am J Bioeth. 2017. PMID: 29111940 No abstract available.
-
Thwarting Shared Decision Making Is an Egregious Medical Error: Let's Treat It Like One.Am J Bioeth. 2017 Nov;17(11):54-56. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1398573. Am J Bioeth. 2017. PMID: 29111944 No abstract available.
-
Needed: A More Rigorous Analysis of Models of Decision Making and a Richer Account of Respect for Autonomy.Am J Bioeth. 2017 Nov;17(11):52-54. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1382168. Am J Bioeth. 2017. PMID: 29111946 No abstract available.
References
-
- Andrade EB, and Ariely D. 2009. The enduring impact of transient emotions on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 109:1–8. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.02.003. - DOI
-
- Beauchamp TL, and Childress JF. 2006. Principles of biomedical ethics, 6th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
-
- Cain DM, Loewenstein G, and Moore DA. 2005. The dirt on coming clean: Perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. Journal of Legal Studies 34:1–25. 10.1086/426699. - DOI
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical