This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Comment

. 2017 Dec;14(12):690-691.

doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.160. Epub 2017 Nov 8.

Surgery: Robotic assistance confers no benefit in rectal cancer surgery

PMID: 29114102
DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.160

Comment

Surgery: Robotic assistance confers no benefit in rectal cancer surgery

Hugh Thomas. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Dec.

. 2017 Dec;14(12):690-691.

doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.160. Epub 2017 Nov 8.

Author

PMID: 29114102
DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.160

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial.
Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, Quirke P, West N, Rautio T, Thomassen N, Tilney H, Gudgeon M, Bianchi PP, Edlin R, Hulme C, Brown J. Jayne D, et al. JAMA. 2017 Oct 24;318(16):1569-1580. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7219. JAMA. 2017. PMID: 29067426 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.

References

1. JAMA. 2017 Oct 24;318(16):1569-1580 - PubMed

Publication types

Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Nature Publishing Group
- Ovid Technologies, Inc.
Other Literature Sources
- scite Smart Citations