Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Oct;6(5):513-529.
doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2017.09.04.

Classification of pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors: new insights

Affiliations
Review

Classification of pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors: new insights

Giuseppe Pelosi et al. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

Neuroendocrine tumors of the lung (Lu-NETs) embrace a heterogeneous family of neoplasms classified into four histological variants, namely typical carcinoid (TC), atypical carcinoid (AC), large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). Defining criteria on resection specimens include mitotic count in 2 mm2 and the presence or absence of necrosis, alongside a constellation of cytological and histological traits including cell size and shape, nuclear features and overall architecture. Clinically, TC are low-grade malignant tumors, AC intermediate-grade malignant tumors and SCLC/LCNEC high-grade malignant full-blown carcinomas with no significant differences in survival between them. Homologous tumors arise in the thymus that occasionally have some difficulties in differentiating from the lung counterparts when presented with large unresectable or metastatic lesions. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) helps refine NE diagnosis at various anatomical sites, particularly on small-sized tissue material, in which only TC and small cell carcinoma categories can be recognized easily on hematoxylin & eosin stain, while AC and LCNEC can only be suggested on such material. The Ki-67 labeling index effectively separates carcinoids from small cell carcinoma and may prove useful for the clinical management of a metastatic disease to help the therapeutic decision-making process. Although carcinoids and high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas in the lung and elsewhere make up separate tumor categories on molecular grounds, emerging data supports the concept of secondary high-grade NETs arising in the preexisting carcinoids, whose clinical and biological relevance will have to be placed into the proper context for the optimal management of these patients. In this review, we will discuss the selected, recent literature with a focus on current issues regarding Lu-NET nosology, i.e., classification, derivation and tumor evolution.

Keywords: Immunohistochemistry (IHC); classification; lung; neuroendocrine; tumor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An example of secondary high-grade neuroendocrine tumor of the lung is depicted according to conventional staining and IHC markers (×200). The lower grade component (A) is composed by carcinoid with no obvious mitoses or necrosis spots, whereas the high-grade component (accounting for more than 50% tumor mass) featured small cells with numerous mitotic figures (yellow asterisks) (B). The lower grade component was positive diffusely for cytokeratin cocktail AE1-AE3 (C), chromogranin A (D), and showed low Ki-67 labeling index (about 15%) (E), with transition areas towards higher grade elements (E, inset). In turn, the high-grade component showed faint decoration for cytokeratin with paranuclear dot-like quality (F) and chromogranin A (G), while Ki-67 labeling index turned out to be very high (about 60%) (H). No differences were instead observed for synaptophysin labeling between the two cell components (D and G, insets). IHC, immunohistochemistry.

References

    1. Travis W, Brambilla E, Burke A, et al. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Lung, Pleura, Thymus and Heart. Fourth Ed. ed. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2015. - PubMed
    1. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Nicholson AG, et al. The 2015 World Health Organization Classification of Lung Tumors: Impact of Genetic, Clinical and Radiologic Advances Since the 2004 Classification. J Thorac Oncol 2015;10:1243-60. 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000630 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Caplin ME, Baudin E, Ferolla P, et al. Pulmonary neuroendocrine (carcinoid) tumors: European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society expert consensus and recommendations for best practice for typical and atypical pulmonary carcinoids. Ann Oncol 2015;26:1604-20. 10.1093/annonc/mdv041 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rindi G, Klersy C, Inzani F, et al. Grading the neuroendocrine tumors of the lung: an evidence-based proposal. Endocr Relat Cancer 2013;21:1-16. 10.1530/ERC-13-0246 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pelosi G, Pattini L, Morana G, et al. Grading lung neuroendocrine tumors: Controversies in search of a solution. Histol Histopathol 2017;32:223-41. - PubMed