Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Oct;6(5):570-587.
doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2017.07.06.

Immunohistochemistry for predictive biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer

Affiliations
Review

Immunohistochemistry for predictive biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer

Mari Mino-Kenudson. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

In the era of targeted therapy, predictive biomarker testing has become increasingly important for non-small cell lung cancer. Of multiple predictive biomarker testing methods, immunohistochemistry (IHC) is widely available and technically less challenging, can provide clinically meaningful results with a rapid turn-around-time and is more cost efficient than molecular platforms. In fact, several IHC assays for predictive biomarkers have already been implemented in routine pathology practice. In this review, we will discuss: (I) the details of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase ROS (ROS1) IHC assays including the performance of multiple antibody clones, pros and cons of IHC platforms and various scoring systems to design an optimal algorithm for predictive biomarker testing; (II) issues associated with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) IHC assays; (III) appropriate pre-analytical tissue handling and selection of optimal tissue samples for predictive biomarker IHC.

Keywords: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK); immunohistochemistry (IHC); non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); predictive biomarker; programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1); proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase ROS (ROS1).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: M Mino-Kenudson has served as a consultant for Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, H3 Biomedicine, and Advanced Cell Diagnostics and as an advisory board member for Roche.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ALK FISH and IHC. (A) An image of ALK FISH from a patient with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma who responded to crizotinib demonstrating scattered red and green signal pairs with less than two-signal diameter distance from each other (arrows) interpreted as negative (×1,000); (B) IHC for ALK (the clone 5A4) from the same tumor exhibiting cytoplasmic staining in the vast majority of the tumor cells (×200). FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Figure 2
Figure 2
IHC for ROS1. (A) A ROS1-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma with cytoplasmic staining of various intensities in the vast majority of the tumor cells (×200); (B) scattered tumor cells with weak cytoplasmic staining (arrows) seen in a case with NSCLC that is negative for a ROS1 gene rearrangement (×400); (C) an example of ROS1 wild type invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma demonstrating weak cytoplasmic staining in the majority of the tumor cells (×200); (D) reactive pneumocytes (arrows) and alveolar macrophages (arrowhead) with weak to moderate cytoplasmic staining of ROS1 in the background of tumor cells that are completely negative for the expression (×400).
Figure 3
Figure 3
IHC for PD-L1. (A,B) Examples of squamous cell carcinomas with PD-L1 membranous staining of various intensities on 90% and 10% of the tumor cells, respectively (×200); (C,D) a cell block specimen with non-small cell carcinoma, favor squamous cell carcinoma, exhibiting PD-L1 membranous staining on 50% of tumor cells (C, ×100; D, ×400). PD-L1 IHC was performed using the clone E1L3N with Leica Bond III autostainer in all three cases.

References

    1. Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, et al. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;346:92-8. 10.1056/NEJMoa011954 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 2009;361:947-57. 10.1056/NEJMoa0810699 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pao W, Miller V, Zakowski M, et al. EGF receptor gene mutations are common in lung cancers from "never smokers" and are associated with sensitivity of tumors to gefitinib and erlotinib. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004;101:13306-11. 10.1073/pnas.0405220101 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2129-39. 10.1056/NEJMoa040938 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paez JG, Janne PA, Lee JC, et al. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science 2004;304:1497-500. 10.1126/science.1099314 - DOI - PubMed