Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul;59(7):1624-1633.
doi: 10.1080/10428194.2017.1397658. Epub 2017 Nov 8.

Severe pegaspargase hypersensitivity reaction rates (grade ≥3) with intravenous infusion vs. intramuscular injection: analysis of 54,280 doses administered to 16,534 patients on children's oncology group (COG) clinical trials

Affiliations

Severe pegaspargase hypersensitivity reaction rates (grade ≥3) with intravenous infusion vs. intramuscular injection: analysis of 54,280 doses administered to 16,534 patients on children's oncology group (COG) clinical trials

Michael J Burke et al. Leuk Lymphoma. 2018 Jul.

Abstract

PEGylated asparaginase (pegaspargase) can be administered via intramuscular (IM) injection or intravenous (IV) infusion with a hypersensitivity reaction (HSR) incidence ranging 3-41%. We evaluated grade ≥3 HSRs when given IM vs. IV on six Children's Oncology Group (COG) leukemia trials (2003-2015) to determine differences in HSR rates. 54,280 doses were administered to 16,534 patients. Considering all doses of pegaspargase during induction, consolidation, and delayed intensification, grade ≥3 HSR rate with IM injection was 5.4% (n = 482/8981) compared to 3.2% for IV (n = 245/7553) (p < .0001). If only the second and third doses of pegaspargase were analyzed, where the majority of grade ≥3 HSRs occur, the rate following IM injection was 10.1% (n = 459/4534) compared to 5.0% (n = 222/4443) for IV (p < .0001). On standardized treatment protocols conducted by the COG during 2003-2015, grade ≥3 HSR rates to pegaspargase occurred less frequently with IV infusion than IM injection.

Keywords: ALL; Pegaspargase; asparaginase; hypersensitivity; intramuscular; intravenous.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential conflict of interest: Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this article online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2017.1397658.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentage by protocol dose of 892 Grade ≥3 hypersensitivity reactions to 54,280 doses of pegaspargase in 16,534 patients on six COG ALL trials, as of 03/2015.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Rate of grade ≥3 hypersensitivity reactions to pegaspargase in patients with newly diagnosed ALL and Lymphoblastic Lymphoma on six COG trials from December 2003 to March 2015: IM and IV administration.

References

    1. Linet MS, Ries LA, Smith MA, et al. Cancer surveillance series: recent trends in childhood cancer incidence and mortality in the United States. J Nat Cancer Inst. 1999;91:1051–1058. - PubMed
    1. Hunger SP, Loh ML, Whitlock JA, et al. Children’s Oncology Group’s 2013 blueprint for research: acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013;60:957–963. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kawedia JD, Rytting ME. Asparaginase in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2014;14(Suppl):S14–S17. - PubMed
    1. Woo MH, Hak LJ, Storm MC, et al. Hypersensitivity or development of antibodies to asparaginase does not impact treatment outcome of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:1525–1532. - PubMed
    1. Zalewska-Szewczyk B, Andrzejewski W, Mlynarski W, et al. The anti-asparagines antibodies correlate with L-asparagines activity and may affect clinical outcome of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2007;48:931–936. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources