Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017;30(6):585-591.
doi: 10.20524/aog.2017.0187. Epub 2017 Aug 17.

Drugs for improving esophageal mucosa defense: where are we now and where are we going?

Affiliations
Review

Drugs for improving esophageal mucosa defense: where are we now and where are we going?

Edoardo Savarino et al. Ann Gastroenterol. 2017.

Abstract

In the past, the attention of physiologists and doctors has been mainly focused on the key role of acid in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but increasing evidence that 20-40% of reflux patients respond not at all or only partially to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has underlined the concept that factors other than acid are implicated in its development and the elicitation of symptoms. Among these, impaired mucosal integrity, particularly in most patients with non-erosive reflux disease, has recently been reincluded and the reinforcement of defensive mechanisms and/or its protection has been reappointed as a renewed therapeutic target for the management of GERD patients. In this review we will summarize the existing knowledge of the old and novel compounds able to produce this therapeutic effect, including sucralfate, alginate-based drugs, and a new medical device consisting of hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulfate dispersed in a bioadhesive carrier, together with the potential indications for their use. It is to be stressed, however, that, although these compounds may represent a real alternative to PPI therapy in GERD, the combination of mucosal protection with acid suppression may help manage many cases with a partial or unsatisfactory response to PPIs alone.

Keywords: Gastroesophageal reflux disease; histology; impedance-pH monitoring; mucosal integrity; non-erosive reflux disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Main pathogenetic factors implicated in gastroesophageal reflux disease
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pathophysiological heterogeneity of non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) by means of 24-h impedance-pH monitoring: the NERD umbrella concept
Figure 3
Figure 3
Expression of microscopic esophagitis in the various forms of gastroesophageal reflux disease, functional heartburn and controls NERD, non-erosive reflux disease

References

    1. El-Serag HB, Sweet S, Winchester CC, Dent J. Update on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut. 2014;63:871–880. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mahadeva S, Raman MC, Ford AC, et al. Gastro-oesophageal reflux is more prevalent in Western dyspeptics: a prospective comparison of British and South-East Asian patients with dyspepsia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;21:1483–1490. - PubMed
    1. Savarino E, de Bortoli N, De Cassan C, et al. The natural history of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: a comprehensive review. Dis Esophagus. 2017;30:1–9. - PubMed
    1. Savarino E, Marabotto E, Bodini G, et al. Epidemiology and natural history of gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2017;63:175–183. - PubMed
    1. Savarino V, Dulbecco P, de Bortoli N, Ottonello A, Savarino E. The appropriate use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs): Need for a reappraisal. Eur J Intern Med. 2017;37:19–24. - PubMed