Are there differences in Hip Biomechanics after hybrid and cementless resurfacing arthroplasty?

Abstract

There is a paucity of information regarding the clinical performance of the fully cementless metal-on-metal hip resurfacing designs. We compared the biomechanical reconstruction between the two hips of a group of patients treated with a hybrid resurfacing design on one side and a new, fully cementless version of the same resurfacing design on the other side.We retrospectively identified 20 patients with a hybrid hip resurfacing on one side and a fully cementless device on the contralateral side. The cemented femoral components were implanted with a target angle stem to shaft angle of 140° while the cementless femoral components were implanted with the aim to replicate the natural neck to shaft angle.No significant differences were observed post-operatively in femoral offset or leg length despite implantation with a larger metaphyseal stem to femoral shaft angle in the hybrid group. Both hybrid and cementless designs provide similar biomechanical reconstructions.