Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Nov 1;48(11):887-893.
doi: 10.3928/23258160-20171030-03.

Comparison of Pneumatic Retinopexy and Scleral Buckle for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair

Yannis M Paulus, Loh-Shan Leung, Svetlana Pilyugina, Mark S Blumenkranz
Comparative Study

Comparison of Pneumatic Retinopexy and Scleral Buckle for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair

Yannis M Paulus et al. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. .

Abstract

Background and objective: To compare pneumatic retinopexy (PR) and scleral buckle for the repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Patients and methods: Retrospective analysis of 90 patients undergoing surgery for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, with 46 patients undergoing PR compared with 44 patients undergoing scleral buckle procedure (SBP).

Results: Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. Single surgery reattachment rate was 95.5% with SBP and 67% with PR (P = .00057). Final reattachment rate was 100% with SBP and 97.8% with PR. A final visual acuity (VA) of 20/40 or better occurred in 89% of patients with SBP and 72% of patients with PR (P = .04). PR and SBP had a similar mean VA if the primary procedures were successful, whereas those patients with unsuccessful PR had lower mean final acuities.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that SBP has a significantly higher rate of single surgery reattachment than PR, along with improved final VA. Initial success of PR may be an important predictor of final visual outcome. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017;48:887-893.].

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: None of the authors has any relevant conflicts of interest to disclose relating to the subject material in this manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean logMAR visual acuity plotted over time in the year following retinal reattachment surgery demonstrates that patients with successful PR and SBP have similar visual acuity outcomes (blue and green bars). Patients who had an unsuccessful PR (red bar) had a significantly worse visual outcome even after 1 year, with a logMAR visual acuity of 0.51 (Snellen equivalent of 20/65) versus 0.11 (Snellen equivalent of 20/25) for those patients with a successful PR.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Schepens CL, Okamura ID, Brockhurst RJ. The scleral buckling procedures. I. Surgical techniques and management. AMA Arch Ophthalmol 1957; 58:797–811. - PubMed
    1. Rumpf J Gonin Jules. Inventor of the surgical treatment for retinal detachment. Surv Ophthalmol 1976; 21:276–84. - PubMed
    1. Sodhi A, Leung LS, Do DV, et al. Recent trends in the management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Surv Ophthalmol 2008; 53:50–67. - PubMed
    1. Schwartz SG, Kuhl DP, McPherson AR, et al. Twenty-year follow-up for scleral buckling. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120:325–9. - PubMed
    1. Lincoff H, Coleman J, Kreissig I, et al. The perfluorocarbon gases in the treatment of retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 1983; 90:546–51. - PubMed

Publication types