Barriers to HPV self-sampling and cytology among low-income indigenous women in rural areas of a middle-income setting: a qualitative study
- PMID: 29121873
- PMCID: PMC5679364
- DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3723-5
Barriers to HPV self-sampling and cytology among low-income indigenous women in rural areas of a middle-income setting: a qualitative study
Abstract
Background: Data is needed about barriers to self-collection of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) samples and cytology among low-income, disadvantaged women living in rural areas of lower-income countries as these women are at increased risk of cervical cancer mortality.
Methods: Individual interviews (n = 29), focus groups (n = 7, 5-11 participants) and discussion groups (n = 2, 18-25 participants) were organized with women from three indigenous ethnic groups residing in rural areas in Mexico, after they were provided with free, self-sampled HPV tests. These groups are low-income, underserved by healthcare and have historically been on the receiving end of racism and social exclusion. Descriptive, qualitative content analysis was done, including two cycles of coding.
Results: Interview and focus/discussion group data indicate women had limited understanding of HPV's role in cervical cancer etiology. They identified HPV's existence, that cytology detects cervical cancer, the need for regular testing and that cervical cancer is sexually transmitted. Organizational barriers to clinic-based cytology included irregular supplies of disposable speculums, distance to clinics and lack of clear communication by healthcare personnel. Women considered self-collected HPV-testing easy, less embarrassing and less painful than cytology, an opportunity for self-care and most felt they understood how to take a self-sample after a 20-min explanation. Some women feared hurting themselves when taking the self-sample or that they would take the sample incorrectly, which they worried would make the test useless. Attending HPV-testing in groups facilitated use by allowing women to discuss their doubts and fears before doing self-collection of the sample or to ask other women who were the first to do the self-sampling what the experience had been like (whether it hurt and how easy it was). Lack of indoor bathrooms was a barrier to doing HPV self-sampling at home, when those homes were resource-poor (one-room dwellings).
Conclusions: Low-income, indigenous Mexican women residing in rural, underserved areas identified their need for cervical cancer screening but encountered multiple barriers to cytology-based screening. They found a number of advantages of HPV self-sampled tests. Employing self-collected HPV-testing instead of cytology could resolve some but not all gender-related, organizational or technical quality-of-care issues within cervical cancer detection and control programs.
Keywords: Barriers to detection; Cervical cancer; Cytology; HPV test; Low-income; Middle-income nations; Qualitative methodology; Rural residence; Self-sample; Underserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Research, Bio-security and Ethics Committees of the National Institute of Public Health of Mexico (The name of the Ethics Committee is Comité de Ética en Investigación, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública). Verbal informed consent was requested in the local language before participation; verbal consent was used instead of written consent because many of the women in the study population were illiterate. A letter of informed consent, which had been approved by the Ethics Committee, was read to the participants in the local language and contact information for the principal researcher (Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce) and for the President of the Ethics Committee was provided to all participants. Women agreeing to participate could do HPV-testing at home or a local community center and could opt to do only the free HPV test or to also participate in an individual interview, focus group or discussion group. Referrals for free cytology (for diagnostic confirmation) and treatment at the closest Ministry of Health clinic were provided to all women with a positive HPV test.
Consent for publication
Not Applicable
Competing interests
At the time of this study, Dr. Attila Lörincz worked for the Digene Corporation which markets an HPV test and which donated the HPV tests used in this study; likewise, Dr. Patricia Uribe-Zúñiga worked for the National HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Center (CENSIDA), which funded the fieldwork of this study. However, Drs. Lörincz and Uribe-Zúñiga were not involved in the fieldwork or analysis, only in study design and writing of the manuscript. These institutions did not provide funding for article publication and had no input on the decision to publish, nor did they participate or have a say in how the fieldwork was carried out, in the analysis or in the content of the manuscript. The remaining co-authors do not have any conflicts of interest to disclose.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Similar articles
-
Self-collection of vaginal specimens for human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer prevention (MARCH): a community-based randomised controlled trial.Lancet. 2011 Nov 26;378(9806):1868-73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61522-5. Epub 2011 Nov 1. Lancet. 2011. PMID: 22051739 Clinical Trial.
-
Attitudes toward self-sampling for cervical cancer screening among primary care attendees living on the US-Mexico border.South Med J. 2014 Jul;107(7):426-32. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000132. South Med J. 2014. PMID: 25010584
-
Barriers and Facilitators to Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women in Rural Ontario, Canada: The Role of Self-Collected HPV Testing.J Rural Health. 2016 Spring;32(2):136-45. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12136. Epub 2015 Aug 12. J Rural Health. 2016. PMID: 26265118
-
Emerging role of HPV self-sampling in cervical cancer screening for hard-to-reach women: Focused literature review.Can Fam Physician. 2017 Aug;63(8):597-601. Can Fam Physician. 2017. PMID: 28807952 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Overview of human papillomavirus-based and other novel options for cervical cancer screening in developed and developing countries.Vaccine. 2008 Aug 19;26 Suppl 10:K29-41. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.06.019. Vaccine. 2008. PMID: 18847555 Review.
Cited by
-
Creating a path forward: understanding the context of sexual health and sexually transmitted infections in American Indian/Alaska Native populations – a review.Sex Health. 2022 Aug;19(4):286-298. doi: 10.1071/SH22040. Sex Health. 2022. PMID: 35760766 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Self-Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing: Increased Cervical Cancer Screening Participation and Incorporation in International Screening Programs.Front Public Health. 2018 Apr 9;6:77. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00077. eCollection 2018. Front Public Health. 2018. PMID: 29686981 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Time and temperature dependent analytical stability of dry-collected Evalyn HPV self-sampling brush for cervical cancer screening.Papillomavirus Res. 2018 Jun;5:192-200. doi: 10.1016/j.pvr.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Apr 22. Papillomavirus Res. 2018. PMID: 29689311 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers and facilitators for adherence to follow-up by HR-HPV-positive women with premalignant cervical lesions: a mixed-design study in Mexico.BMC Womens Health. 2024 Oct 4;24(1):550. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03379-3. BMC Womens Health. 2024. PMID: 39367365 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility of HPV self-sampling pathway in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal using a human-centred design approach.Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021;29(3):2005283. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2021.2005283. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021. PMID: 34928198 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Reath J, Carey M. Breast and cervical cancer in indigenous women-overcoming barriers to early detection. Aust Fam Physician. 2008;37(3):178–182. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical