Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 9;17(1):191.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1044-7.

Diagnostic errors by medical students: results of a prospective qualitative study

Affiliations

Diagnostic errors by medical students: results of a prospective qualitative study

Leah T Braun et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Diagnostic errors occur frequently in daily clinical practice and put patients' safety at risk. There is an urgent need to improve education on clinical reasoning to reduce diagnostic errors. However, little is known about diagnostic errors of medical students. In this study, the nature of the causes of diagnostic errors made by medical students was analyzed.

Methods: In June 2016, 88 medical students worked on eight cases with the chief complaint dyspnea in a laboratory setting using an electronic learning platform, in summary 704 processed cases. The diagnostic steps of the students were tracked and analyzed. Furthermore, after each case the participants stated their presumed diagnosis and explained why they came to their diagnostic conclusion. The content of these explanations was analyzed qualitatively.

Results: Based on the diagnostic data gathering process and the students' explanations, eight different causes could be identified of which the lack of diagnostic skills (24%) and inadequate knowledge base (16%) were the most common. Other causes that often contributed to a diagnostic error were faulty context generation (15%) and premature closure (10%). The causes of misdiagnosis varied per case.

Conclusions: Inadequate skills/knowledge and faulty context generation are the major problems in students' clinical reasoning process. These findings are valuable for improving medical education and thus reducing the frequency of diagnostic errors in students' later everyday clinical practice.

Keywords: Clinical reasoning; Diagnostic errors; Undergraduate medical education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethical committee of the University Hospital Munich (no. 75–16). Informed consent was obtained. The data collection and analysis was completely anonymous.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
List of the cases and contents of the electronic patient record

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shojania KG, Burton EC, KM MD, Goldman L. Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review. JAMA. 2003;289(21):2849–2856. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.21.2849. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Graber ML. The incidence of diagnostic error in medicine. BMJ quality & safety. 2013:bmjqs-2012-001615. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singh H, Schiff GD, Graber ML, Onakpoya I, Thompson MJ. The global burden of diagnostic errors in primary care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016; S. bmjqs-2016-005401 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shojania KG, Burton EC, McDonald KM, Goldman L. The autopsy as an outcome and performance measure. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2002;(58):1–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Graber ML, Franklin N, Gordon R. Diagnostic error in internal medicine. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(13):1493–1499. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.13.1493. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources