Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 9;18(1):60.
doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0220-y.

Ethical aspects of brain computer interfaces: a scoping review

Sasha Burwell  1 , Matthew Sample  1   2 , Eric Racine  3   4   5   6
Affiliations

Ethical aspects of brain computer interfaces: a scoping review

Sasha Burwell et al. BMC Med Ethics. .

Abstract

Background: Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) is a set of technologies that are of increasing interest to researchers. BCI has been proposed as assistive technology for individuals who are non-communicative or paralyzed, such as those with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or spinal cord injury. The technology has also been suggested for enhancement and entertainment uses, and there are companies currently marketing BCI devices for those purposes (e.g., gaming) as well as health-related purposes (e.g., communication). The unprecedented direct connection created by BCI between human brains and computer hardware raises various ethical, social, and legal challenges that merit further examination and discussion.

Methods: To identify and characterize the key issues associated with BCI use, we performed a scoping review of biomedical ethics literature, analyzing the ethics concerns cited across multiple disciplines, including philosophy and medicine.

Results: Based on this investigation, we report that BCI research and its potential translation to therapeutic intervention generate significant ethical, legal, and social concerns, notably with regards to personhood, stigma, autonomy, privacy, research ethics, safety, responsibility, and justice. Our review of the literature determined, furthermore, that while these issues have been enumerated extensively, few concrete recommendations have been expressed.

Conclusions: We conclude that future research should focus on remedying a lack of practical solutions to the ethical challenges of BCI, alongside the collection of empirical data on the perspectives of the public, BCI users, and BCI researchers.

Keywords: Brain-computer interface; Brain-machine interface; Ethics of technology; Scoping review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Search Strategy
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Alpert S. Brain-computer interface devices: risks and Canadian regulations. Account Res. 2008;15(2):63–86. doi: 10.1080/08989620701783774. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clausen J. Man, machine and in between. Nature. 2009;457(7233):1080–1081. doi: 10.1038/4571080a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clausen J. Conceptual and ethical issues with brain-hardware interfaces. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2011;24(6):495–501. - PubMed
    1. Demetriades AK, Demetriades CK, Watts C, Ashkan K. Brain-machine interface: the challenge of neuroethics. Surgeon. 2010;8(5):267–269. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2010.05.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haselager P, Vlek R, Hill J, Nijboer FA. Note on ethical aspects of BCI. Neural Netw. 2009;22(9):1352–1357. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2009.06.046. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources