Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 9;15(1):94.
doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0261-1.

Institutional capacity to generate and use evidence in LMICs: current state and opportunities for HPSR

Affiliations

Institutional capacity to generate and use evidence in LMICs: current state and opportunities for HPSR

Zubin Cyrus Shroff et al. Health Res Policy Syst. .

Abstract

Background: Evidence-informed decision-making for health is far from the norm, particularly in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Health policy and systems research (HPSR) has an important role in providing the context-sensitive and -relevant evidence that is needed. However, there remain significant challenges both on the supply side, in terms of capacity for generation of policy-relevant knowledge such as HPSR, and on the demand side in terms of the demand for and use of evidence for policy decisions. This paper brings together elements from both sides to analyse institutional capacity for the generation of HPSR and the use of evidence (including HPSR) more broadly in LMICs.

Methods: The paper uses literature review methods and two survey instruments (directed at research institutions and Ministries of Health, respectively) to explore the types of institutional support required to enhance the generation and use of evidence.

Results: Findings from the survey of research institutions identified the absence of core funding, the lack of definitional clarity and academic incentive structures for HPSR as significant constraints. On the other hand, the survey of Ministries of Health identified a lack of locally relevant evidence, poor presentation of research findings and low institutional prioritisation of evidence use as significant constraints to evidence uptake. In contrast, improved communication between researchers and decision-makers and increased availability of relevant evidence were identified as facilitators of evidence uptake.

Conclusion: The findings make a case for institutional arrangements in research that provide support for career development, collaboration and cross-learning for researchers, as well as the setting up of institutional arrangements and processes to incentivise the use of evidence among Ministries of Health and other decision-making institutions. The paper ends with a series of recommendations to build institutional capacity in HPSR through engaging multiple stakeholders in identifying and maintaining incentive structures, improving research (including HPSR) training, and developing stronger tools for synthesising non-traditional forms of local, policy-relevant evidence such as grey literature. Addressing challenges on both the supply and demand side can build institutional capacity in the research and policy worlds and support the enhanced uptake of high quality evidence in policy decisions.

Keywords: Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research; Health policy and systems research; Institutional capacity; Low- and middle-income countries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

ZCS, DJ and AG are Staff Members of the Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research. Other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Disclaimer

ZCS, DJ and AG are staff members of the World Health Organization. The authors are themselves alone responsible for the views expressed in this article which do not necessarily represent the views, decisions or policies of the World Health Organization.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Most common sources of evidence for informing decision-making

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dobrow M, Goel V, Upshur R. Evidence-based health policy: context and utilisation. Social Sci Med. 2004;58(1):207–17. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00166-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Sound Choices: Enhancing Capacity for Evidence-informed Health Policy. 2007. Green A, Bennett S (Eds.) http://www.who.int/alliance-hpsr/resources/publications/9789241595902/en/. Accessed 19 August 2015.
    1. Meisel Z, Gollust S, Grande D. Translating research for health policy decisions: is it time for researchers to join social media? Acad Med. 2016;91(10):1341–3. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001182. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Frenk J, González-Pier E, Gómez-Dantés O, Lezana M, Knaul F. Comprehensive reform to improve health system performance in Mexico. Lancet. 2006;368(9546):1524–34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69564-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research. What is Health Policy and Systems Research and Why Does it Matter? AHPSR Briefing Note 1 2007. Geneva, World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/alliance-hpsr/resources/alliancehpsr_briefingnote1.pd.... Accessed 19 August 2015.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources