Cohort profile: workers' compensation in a changing Australian labour market: the return to work (RTW) study
- PMID: 29122788
- PMCID: PMC5695372
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016366
Cohort profile: workers' compensation in a changing Australian labour market: the return to work (RTW) study
Abstract
Purpose: Workers' compensation claims for older workers and workers who have suffered psychological injury are increasing as a proportion of total claims in many jurisdictions. In the Australian state of Victoria, claims from both these groups are associated with higher than average wage replacement and healthcare expenditures. This cohort profile describes a longitudinal study which aims to investigate differences in the return to work (RTW) process for older workers compared with younger workers and claimants with musculoskeletal injuries compared with those with psychological injuries.
Participants: This prospective cohort study involved interviewing workers' compensation claimants at three time points. The cohort was restricted to psychological and musculoskeletal claims. Only claimants aged 18 and over were recruited, with no upper age limit. A total of 869 claimants completed the baseline interview, representing 36% of the eligible claimant population. Ninety-one per cent of participants agreed at baseline to have their survey responses linked to administrative workers' compensation data. Of the 869 claimants who participated at baseline, 632 (73%) took part in the 6-month follow-up interview, and 572 (66%) participated in the 12-month follow-up interview.
Findings to date: Information on different aspects of the RTW process and important factors that may impact the RTW process was collected at the three survey periods. At baseline, participants and non-participants did not differ by injury type or age group, but were more likely to be female and from the healthcare and social assistance industry. The probability of non-participation at follow-up interviews showed younger age was a statistically significant predictor of non-participation.
Future plans: Analysis of the longitudinal cohort will identify important factors in the RTW process and explore differences across age and injury type groups. Ongoing linkage to administrative workers' compensation data will provide information on wage replacement and healthcare service use into the future.
Keywords: longitudinal; musculoskeletal injury; older workers; psychological injury; return to work.
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Figures
Similar articles
-
How Does Perceived Fairness in the Workers' Compensation Claims Process Affect Mental Health Following a Workplace Injury?J Occup Rehabil. 2020 Mar;30(1):40-48. doi: 10.1007/s10926-019-09844-3. J Occup Rehabil. 2020. PMID: 31302817
-
Predictors of sustained return to work after work-related injury or disease: insights from workers' compensation claims records.J Occup Rehabil. 2012 Sep;22(3):283-91. doi: 10.1007/s10926-011-9344-y. J Occup Rehabil. 2012. PMID: 22143197
-
Initial return to work and long-term employment patterns: Associations with work-related permanent impairment and with participation in workers' compensation-based return-to-work programs.Am J Ind Med. 2021 May;64(5):323-337. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23233. Epub 2021 Feb 22. Am J Ind Med. 2021. PMID: 33616241 Free PMC article.
-
Injured worker participation in assessment during the acute phase of workers compensation rehabilitation: a scoping review.Disabil Rehabil. 2025 Jan;47(1):69-79. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2337101. Epub 2024 Apr 9. Disabil Rehabil. 2025. PMID: 38592042
-
Scoping review of claimants' experiences within Australian workers' compensation systems.Aust Health Rev. 2019 Aug;43(4):457-465. doi: 10.1071/AH17244. Aust Health Rev. 2019. PMID: 30032739
Cited by
-
How Does Perceived Fairness in the Workers' Compensation Claims Process Affect Mental Health Following a Workplace Injury?J Occup Rehabil. 2020 Mar;30(1):40-48. doi: 10.1007/s10926-019-09844-3. J Occup Rehabil. 2020. PMID: 31302817
-
Differences Over Time in the Prognostic Effect of Return to Work Self-Efficacy on a Sustained Return to Work.J Occup Rehabil. 2019 Sep;29(3):660-667. doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-09824-z. J Occup Rehabil. 2019. PMID: 30719610
-
Cohort profile: the Ontario Life After Workplace Injury Study (OLAWIS).BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 6;11(9):e048143. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048143. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34489277 Free PMC article.
-
Cannabis use among workers with work-related injuries and illnesses: results from a cross-sectional study of workers' compensation claimants in Ontario, Canada.BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 18;13(7):e072994. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072994. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37463805 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Safe Work Australia. Key workers’ compensation information, Australia 2014. Canberra, ACT: Safe Work Australia, 2015.
-
- Safe Work Australia. Comparison of workers’ compensation arrangements in Australia and New Zealand. Canberra, ACT: Safe Work Australia, 2011.
-
- Ostry A. From chainsaws to keyboards: injury and industrial disease in British Columbia : Sullivan T, Injury and the new world of work. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2000:27–45.
-
- Safe Work Australia. Australian work-related injury experience by sex and age, 2009-2010. Canberra, ACT: Safe Work Australia, 2012.
-
- Safe Work Australia. Compendium of workers’ compensation statistics: Australia 2009-2010. Canberra, ACT: Safe Work Australia, 2012.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical