Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 8;7(11):e016366.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016366.

Cohort profile: workers' compensation in a changing Australian labour market: the return to work (RTW) study

Affiliations

Cohort profile: workers' compensation in a changing Australian labour market: the return to work (RTW) study

Christina Dimitriadis et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Purpose: Workers' compensation claims for older workers and workers who have suffered psychological injury are increasing as a proportion of total claims in many jurisdictions. In the Australian state of Victoria, claims from both these groups are associated with higher than average wage replacement and healthcare expenditures. This cohort profile describes a longitudinal study which aims to investigate differences in the return to work (RTW) process for older workers compared with younger workers and claimants with musculoskeletal injuries compared with those with psychological injuries.

Participants: This prospective cohort study involved interviewing workers' compensation claimants at three time points. The cohort was restricted to psychological and musculoskeletal claims. Only claimants aged 18 and over were recruited, with no upper age limit. A total of 869 claimants completed the baseline interview, representing 36% of the eligible claimant population. Ninety-one per cent of participants agreed at baseline to have their survey responses linked to administrative workers' compensation data. Of the 869 claimants who participated at baseline, 632 (73%) took part in the 6-month follow-up interview, and 572 (66%) participated in the 12-month follow-up interview.

Findings to date: Information on different aspects of the RTW process and important factors that may impact the RTW process was collected at the three survey periods. At baseline, participants and non-participants did not differ by injury type or age group, but were more likely to be female and from the healthcare and social assistance industry. The probability of non-participation at follow-up interviews showed younger age was a statistically significant predictor of non-participation.

Future plans: Analysis of the longitudinal cohort will identify important factors in the RTW process and explore differences across age and injury type groups. Ongoing linkage to administrative workers' compensation data will provide information on wage replacement and healthcare service use into the future.

Keywords: longitudinal; musculoskeletal injury; older workers; psychological injury; return to work.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Time between the first date of incapacity and date of the baseline interview.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Return to work study, participation and loss to follow-up.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Safe Work Australia. Key workers’ compensation information, Australia 2014. Canberra, ACT: Safe Work Australia, 2015.
    1. Safe Work Australia. Comparison of workers’ compensation arrangements in Australia and New Zealand. Canberra, ACT: Safe Work Australia, 2011.
    1. Ostry A. From chainsaws to keyboards: injury and industrial disease in British Columbia : Sullivan T, Injury and the new world of work. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2000:27–45.
    1. Safe Work Australia. Australian work-related injury experience by sex and age, 2009-2010. Canberra, ACT: Safe Work Australia, 2012.
    1. Safe Work Australia. Compendium of workers’ compensation statistics: Australia 2009-2010. Canberra, ACT: Safe Work Australia, 2012.

LinkOut - more resources