Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov;10(11):e006774.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.006774.

Optimized Prognosis Assessment in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Using a Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Risk Score

Affiliations

Optimized Prognosis Assessment in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Using a Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Risk Score

Thomas Stiermaier et al. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) demonstrated great potential for the prediction of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a CMR-based risk score for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients.

Methods and results: The scoring model was developed and validated on ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction cohorts from 2 independent randomized controlled trials (n=738 and n=458 patients, respectively) and included left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, infarct size, and microvascular obstruction. Primary end point was the 12-month MACE rate consisting of death, reinfarction, and new congestive heart failure. In the derivation cohort, LV ejection fraction ≤47%, infarct size ≥19%LV, and microvascular obstruction ≥1.4%LV were identified as the best cutoff values for MACE prediction. According to the hazard ratios in multivariable regression analysis, the CMR risk score was created by attributing 1 point for LV ejection fraction ≤47%, 1 point for infarct size ≥19%LV, and 2 points for microvascular obstruction ≥1.4%LV. In the validation cohort, the score showed a good prediction of MACE (area under the curve: 0.76). Stratification into a low (0/1 point) and high-risk group (≥2 points) resulted in significantly higher MACE rates in high-risk patients (9.0% versus 2.2%; P=0.001). Inclusion of the CMR score in addition to a model of clinical risk factors led to a significant increase of C statistics from 0.74 to 0.83 (P=0.037), a net reclassification improvement of 0.18 (P=0.009), and an integrated discriminative improvement of 0.04 (P=0.010).

Conclusions: Our approach integrates the prognostic information of CMR imaging into a simple risk score that showed incremental prognostic value over clinical risk factors in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients.

Clinical trial registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT00712101 and NCT02158468.

Keywords: heart; heart failure; infarction; prognosis; risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data