Retrospective analysis of the financial break-even point for intrathecal morphine pump use in Korea
- PMID: 29123622
- PMCID: PMC5665739
- DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2017.30.4.272
Retrospective analysis of the financial break-even point for intrathecal morphine pump use in Korea
Abstract
Background: The high cost of intrathecal morphine pump (ITMP) implantation may be the main obstacle to its use. Since July 2014, the Korean national health insurance (NHI) program began paying 50% of the ITMP implantation cost in select refractory chronic pain patients. The aims of this study were to investigate the financial break-even point and patients' satisfaction in patients with ITMP treatment after the initiation of the NHI reimbursement.
Methods: We collected data retrospectively or via direct phone calls to patients who underwent ITMP implantation at a single university-based tertiary hospital between July 2014 and May 2016. Pain severity, changes in the morphine equivalent daily dosage (MEDD), any adverse events, and patients' satisfaction were determined. We calculated the financial break-even point of ITMP implantation via investigating the patient's actual medical costs and insurance information.
Results: During the studied period, 23 patients received ITMP implantation, and 20 patients were included in our study. Scores on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain were significantly reduced compared to the baseline value (P < 0.001). The MEDD before ITMP implantation was 0.59 [IQR: 0.55-0.82]. The total MEDD increased steadily to 0.77 [IQR: 0.53-1.08] at 1 year, which was 126% of the baseline (P < 0.001). More than a half (60%) responded that the ITMP therapy was somewhat satisfying. The financial break-even point was 28 months for ITMP treatment after the NHI reimbursement policy.
Conclusions: ITMP provided effective chronic pain management with improved satisfaction and reasonable financial break-even point of 28 months with 50% financial coverage by NHI program.
Keywords: Chronic pain; Cost; Drug dosage calculation; Health insurance; Intrathecal morphine pump; Morphine; Patient satisfaction.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Intrathecal Morphine Infusion Therapy in Management of Chronic Pain: Present and Future Implementation in Korea.Yonsei Med J. 2016 Mar;57(2):475-81. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.2.475. Yonsei Med J. 2016. PMID: 26847303 Free PMC article.
-
Does lumbar spinal decompression or fusion surgery influence outcome parameters in patients with intrathecal morphine treatment for persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2 (PSPS-T2).Scand J Pain. 2023 Sep 6;23(4):677-686. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2023-0042. Print 2023 Oct 26. Scand J Pain. 2023. PMID: 37667441
-
Transition from Compounded to Monotherapy Intrathecal Pain Medication Reduces Drug Costs: Retrospective Analysis of Patient Billing Data.Pain Physician. 2021 Sep;24(6):489-494. Pain Physician. 2021. PMID: 34554697
-
Increasing back and radicular pain 2 years following intrathecal pump implantation with review of arachnoiditis.Pain Med. 2013 Nov;14(11):1658-63. doi: 10.1111/pme.12188. Epub 2013 Jul 25. Pain Med. 2013. PMID: 23889758 Review.
-
[Management of intractable cancer pain: from intrathecal morphine to cell allograft].Neurochirurgie. 2000 Nov;46(5):454-65. Neurochirurgie. 2000. PMID: 11084478 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Intrathecal Morphine Infusion Therapy via a Percutaneous Port for Refractory Cancer Pain in China: An Efficacy, Safety and Cost Utilization Analysis.J Pain Res. 2020 Jan 23;13:231-237. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S233905. eCollection 2020. J Pain Res. 2020. PMID: 32021412 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analyses in Thailand of Continuous Intrathecal Morphine Infusion Compared with Conventional Therapy in Cancer Pain: A 10-year Multicenter Retrospective Study.Can J Pain. 2023 Jul 28;7(1):2225564. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2023.2225564. eCollection 2023. Can J Pain. 2023. PMID: 37533506 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources