Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May 2;3(4):320-325.
doi: 10.1002/ams2.193. eCollection 2016 Oct.

A retrospective study of in-hospital cardiac arrest

Affiliations

A retrospective study of in-hospital cardiac arrest

Shinsuke Fujiwara et al. Acute Med Surg. .

Abstract

Aim: In-hospital cardiac arrest is an important issue in health care today. Data regarding in-hospital cardiac arrest in Japan is limited. In Australia and the USA, the Rapid Response System has been implemented in many institutions and data regarding in-hospital cardiac arrest are collected to evaluate the efficacy of the Rapid Response System. This is a multicenter retrospective survey of in-hospital cardiac arrest, providing data before implementing a Rapid Response System.

Methods: Ten institutions planning to introduce a Rapid Response System were recruited to collect in-hospital cardiac arrest data. The Institutional Review Board at each participating institution approved this study. Data for patients admitted at each institution from April 1, 2011 until March 31, 2012 were extracted using the three keywords "closed-chest compression", "epinephrine", and "defibrillation". Patients under 18 years old, or who suffered cardiac arrest in the emergency room or the intensive care unit were excluded.

Results: A total of 228 patients in 10 institutions were identified. The average age was 73 ± 13 years. Males represented 64% of the patients (82/146). Overall survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest was 7% (16/228). Possibly preventable cardiac arrests represented 15% (33/228) of patients, with medical safety issues identified in 8% (19/228). Vital sign abnormalities before cardiac arrest were observed in 63% (138/216) of patients.

Conclusions: Approximately 60% of patients had abnormal vital signs before cardiac arrest. These patients may have an improved clinical outcome by implementing a Rapid Response System.

Keywords: In‐hospital cardiopulmonary arrest; multicenter study; rapid response system; retrospective.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of identified in‐hospital cardiac arrest patients in 10 Japanese medical institutions planning to introduce a Rapid Response System. CPA, cardiopulmonary arrest.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of physiologic abnormalities in the 24 h preceding cardiac arrest in 140 patients. Some symptoms overlap, affecting total counts. BP, blood pressure; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; HR, heart rate; LOC, loss of consciousness; RR, respiratory rate; Sat, saturation.

References

    1. Lee A, Bishop G, Hillman K, Daffurn K. The medical emergency team. Anaesth. Intensive Care 1995; 23: 183–6. - PubMed
    1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. Errors in Health Care. To Err Is Human. Washington,D.C: National Academies Press, 2000; 26–48. - PubMed
    1. DeVita MA, Bellomo R, Hillman K et al Findings of the first consensus conference on medical emergency teams. Crit. Care Med. 2006; 34: 2463–78. - PubMed
    1. Chen J, Ou L, Hillman KM et al Cardiopulmonary arrest and mortality trends, and their association with rapid response system expansion. Med. J. Aust. 2014; 201: 167–70. - PubMed
    1. Winters BD, Weaver SJ, Pfoh ER, Yang T, Pham JC, Dy SM. Rapid‐response systems as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Ann. Intern. Med. 2013; 158: 417–25. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources