Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Oct 23:7:506.
doi: 10.7916/D8V69X3S. eCollection 2017.

The Anatomical Basis for Dystonia: The Motor Network Model

Affiliations
Review

The Anatomical Basis for Dystonia: The Motor Network Model

H A Jinnah et al. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). .

Abstract

Background: The dystonias include a clinically and etiologically very diverse group of disorders. There are both degenerative and non-degenerative subtypes resulting from genetic or acquired causes. Traditionally, all dystonias have been viewed as disorders of the basal ganglia. However, there has been increasing appreciation for involvement of other brain regions including the cerebellum, thalamus, midbrain, and cortex. Much of the early evidence for these other brain regions has come from studies of animals, but multiple recent studies have been done with humans, in an effort to confirm or refute involvement of these other regions. The purpose of this article is to review the new evidence from animals and humans regarding the motor network model, and to address the issues important to translational neuroscience.

Methods: The English literature was reviewed for articles relating to the neuroanatomical basis for various types of dystonia in both animals and humans.

Results: There is evidence from both animals and humans that multiple brain regions play an important role in various types of dystonia. The most direct evidence for specific brain regions comes from animal studies using pharmacological, lesion, or genetic methods. In these studies, experimental manipulations of specific brain regions provide direct evidence for involvement of the basal ganglia, cerebellum, thalamus and other regions. Additional evidence also comes from human studies using neuropathological, neuroimaging, non-invasive brain stimulation, and surgical interventions. In these studies, the evidence is less conclusive, because discriminating the regions that cause dystonia from those that reflect secondary responses to abnormal movements is more challenging.

Discussion: Overall, the evidence from both animals and humans suggests that different regions may play important roles in different subtypes of dystonia. The evidence so far provides strong support for the motor network model. There are obvious challenges, but also advantages, of attempting to translate knowledge gained from animals into a more complete understanding of human dystonia and novel therapeutic strategies.

Keywords: Dystonia; blepharospasm; cervical dystonia; focal hand dystonia; laryngeal dystonia; neuroanatomy; neuroimaging; spasmodic dysphonia; torticollis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Funding: This work was supported in part by a grant to the Dystonia Coalition, a consortium of the Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (RDCRN) that is supported by the Office of Rare Diseases Research (ORDR) at the National Center for Advancing Clinical and Translational Studies (NCATS; U54 TR001456) in collaboration with the National Institute for Neurological Diseases and Stroke (NINDS; U54 NS065701). It was also supported in part by grant R01 NS088528. Conflicts of Interest: The authors report no conflict of interest. Ethics Statement: Not applicable for this category of article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Albanese A, Bhatia K, Bressman SB, DeLong MR, Fahn S, Fung VSC, et al. Phenomenology and classification of dystonia: a consensus update. Mov Disord. 2013;28:863–873. doi: 10.1002/mds.25475. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fung VS, Jinnah HA, Bhatia K, Vidailhet M. Assessment of the patient with dystonia: an update on dystonia syndromes. Mov Disord. 2013;28:889–898. doi: 10.1002/mds.25549. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. LeDoux MS, Dauer WT, Warner T. Emerging molecular pathways for dystonia. Mov Disord. 2013;15:968–981. doi: 10.1002/mds.25547. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Popa T, Milani P, Richard A, Hubsch C, Brochard V, Tranchant C, et al. The neurophysiological features of myoclonus-dystonia and differentiation from other dystonias. JAMA Neurol. 2014;71:612–619. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.99. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jinnah HA, Berardelli A, Comella C, DeFazio D, DeLong MR, Factor S, et al. The focal dystonias: current views and challenges for future research. Mov Disord. 2013;7:926–943. doi: 10.1002/mds.25567. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types