Efficacy of Single-Port Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Lobectomy Compared with Triple-Port VATS by Propensity Score Matching
- PMID: 29124025
- PMCID: PMC5628961
- DOI: 10.5090/kjtcs.2017.50.5.339
Efficacy of Single-Port Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Lobectomy Compared with Triple-Port VATS by Propensity Score Matching
Abstract
Background: In recent years, single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lobectomy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has become increasingly common. The objective of this study was to compare the feasibility and safety of single-port and triple-port VATS lobectomy.
Methods: A total of 73 patients with NSCLC who underwent VATS lobectomy from December 2011 to August 2016 were retrospectively reviewed, including 47 in the triple-port group and 26 in the single-port group. Statistical analysis was performed after propensity score matching. Patients were matched on a 1-to-1 basis.
Results: Operative time and intraoperative blood loss in the triple-port group and the single-port group were similar (189.4±50.8 minutes vs. 205.4±50.6 minutes, p=0.259; 286.5±531.0 mL vs. 314.6±513.1 mL, p=0.813). There were no cases of morbidity or mortality. No significant differences in complications or the total number of dissected lymph nodes were found between the 2 groups. In the single-port group, more mediastinal lymph nodes were dissected than in the triple-port group (1.7±0.6 vs. 1.2±0.5, p=0.011). Both groups had 1 patient with bronchopleural fistula. Chest tube duration and postoperative hospital stay were shorter in the single-port group than in the triple-port group (8.7±5.1 days vs. 6.2±6.6 days, p=0.130; 11.7±6.1 days vs. 9.5±6.4 days, p=0.226). However, the differences were not statistically significant. In the single-port group, the rate of conversion to multi-port VATS lobectomy was 11.5% (3 of 26). The rates of conversion to open thoracotomy in the triple-port and single-port groups were 7.7% and 3.8%, respectively (p=1.000).
Conclusion: In comparison with the triple-port group, single-port VATS lobectomy showed similar results in safety and efficacy, indicating that single-port VATS lobectomy is a feasible and safe option for lung cancer patients.
Keywords: Lobectomy; Lung neoplasms; Video-assisted thoracic surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article are reported.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The perioperative outcomes of uniport versus two-port and three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Nov 8;17(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-02034-y. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022. PMID: 36348498 Free PMC article.
-
[To Explore Clinical Value of Single-port Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in Elderly Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Lobectomy, Segmentectomy and Lobectomy vs Segmentectomy].Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2018 Apr 20;21(4):287-295. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2018.04.11. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2018. PMID: 29587908 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Perioperative comparison of video-assisted thoracic surgery and open lobectomy for pT1-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients in China: a multi-center propensity score-matched analysis.Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 Jan;10(1):402-414. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-1132. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021. PMID: 33569322 Free PMC article.
-
Modular Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy and Lymphadenectomy: A Novel Pattern of Endoscopic Lung Cancer Resection.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Dec;27(12):1230-1235. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0063. Epub 2017 May 31. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017. PMID: 28562171
-
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus muscle-sparing thoracotomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Surg. 2019 Oct 15;19(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0618-1. BMC Surg. 2019. PMID: 31615490 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The perioperative outcomes of uniport versus two-port and three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Nov 8;17(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-02034-y. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022. PMID: 36348498 Free PMC article.
-
A novel suction-based lung-stabilizing device in single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical procedures.Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 May;68(5):503-507. doi: 10.1007/s11748-019-01249-6. Epub 2019 Nov 15. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020. PMID: 31728836
-
Uniportal Versus Multiportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Lung Cancer: An Updated Meta-analysis.Lung. 2021 Feb;199(1):43-53. doi: 10.1007/s00408-020-00411-9. Epub 2021 Jan 2. Lung. 2021. PMID: 33388973 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes of Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in the Management of Lobectomy and Segmentectomy for Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Propensity Score-Matched Cohorts.Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025;31(1):24-00137. doi: 10.5761/atcs.ra.24-00137. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025. PMID: 40024767 Free PMC article.
-
Perioperative comparison of uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for complex segmentectomy of the lower lung lobe.BMC Surg. 2025 May 21;25(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02944-3. BMC Surg. 2025. PMID: 40394533 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Shen Y, Wang H, Feng M, Xi Y, Tan L, Wang Q. Single- versus multiple-port thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer: a propensity-matched study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49(Suppl 1):i48–53. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources