The neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) approach to nerve sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a British setting - a prospective observational comparative study
- PMID: 29124889
- DOI: 10.1111/bju.14078
The neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) approach to nerve sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a British setting - a prospective observational comparative study
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) technique in a British setting in men undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) .
Patients and methods: We retrospectively analysed our prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent RALP between November 2008 and February 2017. We examined preoperative pathological and functional parameters, intraoperative nerve sparing (NS), postoperative histology, as well as functional and oncological follow-up. We compared those who had a NeuroSAFE approach and those who had NS without NeuroSAFE. We also compared all the RALPs before and after the introduction of NeuroSAFE. Statistical analysis was done using the two-tailed t-test and chi-squared analysis.
Results: This single surgeon series included 417 RALPs, including 120 NeuroSAFEs. The NeuroSAFE cohort had a greater proportion of D'Amico high-risk disease (30.8% vs 9.6%, P < 0.001), higher Gleason scores and higher pT stage compared to the non-NeuroSAFE NS cohort. After the introduction of NeuroSAFE, more preoperatively potent men underwent bilateral NS with pT2 disease (84.6% vs 66.3%, P = 0.002) and more overall NS were performed in patients with pT3 disease (65.1% vs 36.7%, P = 0.012). Overall positive surgical margin (PSM) rates were lower in the NeuroSAFE cohort compared to those who had NS without NeuroSAFE (9.2% vs 17.8%, P = 0.04). The 12-month potency rates were also higher in the NeuroSAFE cohort for both bilateral (77.3% vs 50.9%, P = 0.009) and unilateral (70.6% vs 40%, P = 0.04) NS. Pad-free continence was also higher in the NeuroSAFE group (85.7% vs 70.9%, P = 0.019), but there was no significant difference between those who were wearing ≤1 safety pad. Although we only had short-term oncological follow-up, it did not significantly differ between the two groups.
Conclusion: Adoption of NeuroSAFE allowed us to offer NS in higher risk patients, whilst reducing PSM rates and at the same time improving potency at 12 months.
Keywords: NeuroSAFE; frozen section; nerve sparing; potency; prostate cancer; prostatectomy.
© 2017 The Authors BJU International © 2017 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
NeuroSAFE in radical prostatectomy increases the rate of nerve-sparing surgery without affecting oncological outcome.BJU Int. 2022 Nov;130(5):628-636. doi: 10.1111/bju.15771. Epub 2022 Jun 5. BJU Int. 2022. PMID: 35536200 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) increases nerve-sparing frequency and reduces positive surgical margins in open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience after 11,069 consecutive patients.Eur Urol. 2012 Aug;62(2):333-40. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.04.057. Epub 2012 May 10. Eur Urol. 2012. PMID: 22591631
-
A feasible and time-efficient adaptation of NeuroSAFE for da Vinci robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Eur Urol. 2014 Jul;66(1):138-44. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.014. Epub 2013 Dec 24. Eur Urol. 2014. PMID: 24411279
-
NeuroSAFE robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus standard robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for men with localised prostate cancer (NeuroSAFE PROOF): protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study.BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 11;9(6):e028132. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028132. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31189680 Free PMC article.
-
Current status of various neurovascular bundle-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.J Robot Surg. 2016 Sep;10(3):187-200. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0607-7. Epub 2016 Jun 1. J Robot Surg. 2016. PMID: 27251473 Review.
Cited by
-
Estimated Costs Associated With Radiation Therapy for Positive Surgical Margins During Radical Prostatectomy.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e201913. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1913. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 32232450 Free PMC article.
-
Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy using the neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE): results after 20 years of experience.Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2025 Jun;28(2):483-489. doi: 10.1038/s41391-024-00851-x. Epub 2024 Jun 11. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2025. PMID: 38862777
-
Impact of human placental derivative allografts on functional and oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy: a literature review.J Robot Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):265-273. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01433-6. Epub 2022 Jun 18. J Robot Surg. 2023. PMID: 35717486 Review.
-
NeuroSAFE in radical prostatectomy increases the rate of nerve-sparing surgery without affecting oncological outcome.BJU Int. 2022 Nov;130(5):628-636. doi: 10.1111/bju.15771. Epub 2022 Jun 5. BJU Int. 2022. PMID: 35536200 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Effect of Adverse Patient Characteristics on Perioperative Outcomes in Open and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.Front Surg. 2020 Nov 10;7:584897. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.584897. eCollection 2020. Front Surg. 2020. PMID: 33240927 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous