The timing of venous thromboembolic events after spine surgery: a single-center experience with 6869 consecutive patients
- PMID: 29125431
- DOI: 10.3171/2017.5.SPINE161399
The timing of venous thromboembolic events after spine surgery: a single-center experience with 6869 consecutive patients
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Venous thromboembolic events (VTEs), including both deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism, are a major cause of morbidity and mortality after spine surgery. Prophylactic anticoagulation, or chemoprophylaxis, can prevent VTE. However, the timing of VTEs after spine surgery and the effect of chemoprophylaxis on VTE timing remain underinvestigated. METHODS The records of 6869 consecutive spine surgeries were retrospectively examined. Data on patient demographics, surgical variables, hospital course, and timing of VTEs were collected. Patients who received chemoprophylaxis were compared with those who did not. Appropriate regression models were used to examine selection for chemoprophylaxis and the timing of VTEs. RESULTS Age (OR 1.037, 95% CI 1.023-1.051; p < 0.001), longer surgery (OR 1.003, 95% CI 1.002-1.004; p < 0.001), history of DVT (OR 1.697, 95% CI 1.038-2.776; p = 0.035), and fusion surgery (OR 1.917, 95% CI 1.356-2.709; p < 0.001) predicted selection for chemoprophylaxis. Chemoprophylaxis patients experienced more VTEs (3.62% vs 2.03% of patients, respectively; p < 0.001), and also required longer hospital stays (5.0 days vs 1.0 days; HR 0.5107; p < 0.0001) and had a greater time to the occurrence of VTE (median 6.8 days vs 3.6 days; HR 0.6847; p = 0.0003). The cumulative incidence of VTEs correlated with the postoperative day in both groups (Spearman r = 0.9746, 95% CI 0.9457-0.9883, and p < 0.0001 for the chemoprophylaxis group; Spearman r = 0.9061, 95% CI 0.8065-0.9557, and p < 0.0001 for the nonchemoprophylaxis group), and the cumulative incidence of VTEs was higher in the nonchemoprophylaxis group throughout the 30-day postoperative period. Cumulative VTE incidence and postoperative day were linearly correlated in the first 2 postoperative weeks (R = 0.9396 and p < 0.0001 for the chemoprophylaxis group; R = 0.8190 and p = 0.0003 for the nonchemoprophylaxis group) and the remainder of the 30-day postoperative period (R = 0.9535 and p < 0.0001 for the chemoprophylaxis group; R = 0.6562 and p = 0.0058 for the nonchemoprophylaxis group), but the linear relationships differ between these 2 postoperative periods (p < 0.0001 for both groups). CONCLUSIONS Anticoagulation reduces the cumulative incidence of VTE after spine surgery. The cumulative incidence of VTEs rises linearly in the first 2 postoperative weeks and then plateaus. Surgeons should consider early initiation of chemoprophylaxis for patients undergoing spine surgery.
Keywords: BMI = body mass index; CPT= Current Procedural Terminology; DVT; DVT = deep venous thrombosis; EBL = estimated blood loss; VTE = venous thromboembolic event; anticoagulation; chemoprophylaxis; deep vein thrombosis; pulmonary embolism; spine surgery; vascular disorders; venous thromboembolism.
Similar articles
-
Timing and risks of chemoprophylaxis after spinal surgery: a single-center experience with 6869 consecutive patients.J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Dec;27(6):681-693. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.SPINE161076. Epub 2017 Sep 8. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017. PMID: 28885127
-
Venous thromboembolic events in patients undergoing craniotomy for tumor resection: incidence, predictors, and review of literature.J Neurosurg. 2019 Jan 4;132(1):10-21. doi: 10.3171/2018.7.JNS181175. Print 2020 Jan 1. J Neurosurg. 2019. PMID: 30611138 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Decreased incidence of venous thromboembolism after spine surgery with early multimodal prophylaxis: Clinical article.J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Oct;21(4):677-84. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.SPINE13447. Epub 2014 Aug 8. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014. PMID: 25105337
-
Venous thromboembolism events following spinal fractures: A single center experience.Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018 Nov;174:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.08.030. Epub 2018 Aug 27. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018. PMID: 30189328
-
A systematic review and meta-analysis of incidence, prognosis, and laboratory indicators of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019.J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021 Sep;9(5):1099-1111.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.01.012. Epub 2021 Jan 30. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021. PMID: 33529719 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Venous Thromboembolism After Degenerative Spine Surgery: A Nationwide Readmissions Database Analysis.World Neurosurg. 2019 May;125:e165-e174. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.029. Epub 2019 Jan 23. World Neurosurg. 2019. PMID: 30684695 Free PMC article.
-
Time-to-event analyses of lower-limb venous thromboembolism in aged patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery: a retrospective study of 1620 patients.Aging (Albany NY). 2019 Oct 15;11(19):8701-8709. doi: 10.18632/aging.102364. Epub 2019 Oct 15. Aging (Albany NY). 2019. PMID: 31613794 Free PMC article.
-
Risk Factors for Venous Thrombosis after Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Mar 27;2022:1621106. doi: 10.1155/2022/1621106. eCollection 2022. Comput Math Methods Med. 2022. PMID: 35387225 Free PMC article.
-
Using machine learning and big data for the prediction of venous thromboembolic events after spine surgery: A single-center retrospective analysis of multiple models on a cohort of 6869 patients.J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2023 Jul-Sep;14(3):221-229. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_69_23. Epub 2023 Sep 18. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2023. PMID: 37860027 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical