Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec 11;10(3-4):275-281.
doi: 10.3233/PRM-170455.

Evaluation of spina bifida transitional care practices in the United States

Maryellen S Kelly  1 , Judy Thibadeau  2 , Sara Struwe  3 , Lisa Ramen  3 , Lijing Ouyang  2 , Jonathan Routh  1
Affiliations

Evaluation of spina bifida transitional care practices in the United States

Maryellen S Kelly et al. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. .

Abstract

Purpose: Recent studies have revealed that the lack of continuity in preparing patients with spina bifida to transition into adult-centered care may have detrimental health consequences. We sought to describe current practices of transitional care services offered at spina bifida clinics in the US.

Methods: Survey design followed the validated transitional care survey by the National Cystic Fibrosis center. Survey was amended for spina bifida. Face validity was completed. Survey was distributed to registered clinics via the Spina Bifida Association. Results were analyzed via descriptive means.

Results: Total of 34 clinics responded. Over 90 characteristics were analyzed per clinic. The concept of transition is discussed with most patients. Most clinics discuss mobility, bowel and bladder management, weight, and education plans consistently. Most do not routinely evaluate their process or discuss insurance coverage changes with patients. Only 30% communicate with the adult providers. Sexuality, pregnancy and reproductive issues are not readily discussed in most clinics. Overall clinics self-rate themselves as a 5/10 in their ability to provide services for their patients during transition.

Conclusions: Characteristics of current transitional care services and formal transitional care programs at US clinics show wide variances in what is offered to patients and families.

Keywords: Spina bifida; myelomeningocele; transitional care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Frequency of items contained in a medical summary for adult providers, n = 29.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Number of clinics performing each aspect as part of routine transitional care evaluation.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Frequency that each topic is part of health assessment or education for adolescents.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Frequency of assessment of patient’s ability to independently complete task n = 33.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. American Academy of Pediatrics AAoFP, American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine. A consensus statement on health care transitions for young adults with special health care needs. Pediatrics. 2002;110(6 Pt 2):1304–6. - PubMed
    1. Binks JA, Barden WS, Burke TA, et al. What do we really know about the transition to adult-centered health care? A focus on cerebral palsy and spina bifida. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:1064–73. - PubMed
    1. Bowman RM, McLone DG, Grant JA, et al. Spina bifida outcome: a 25-year prospective. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2001;34(3):114–20. - PubMed
    1. Davis BE, Daley CM, Shurtleff DB, et al. Long-term survival of individuals with myelomeningocele. Pediatr Neuosurg. 2005;41(4):186–91. - PubMed
    1. Thibadeau JK, Alriksson-Schmidt AI, Zabel TA. The National Spina Bifida Program transition initiative: the people, the plan, and the process. Pediatr Clin N Am. 2010;57(4):903–10. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms