Inconsistent selection of outcomes and measurement devices found in shoulder arthroplasty research: An analysis of studies on ClinicalTrials.gov
- PMID: 29125866
- PMCID: PMC5681263
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187865
Inconsistent selection of outcomes and measurement devices found in shoulder arthroplasty research: An analysis of studies on ClinicalTrials.gov
Abstract
Introduction: Recent evidence suggests a lack of standardization of shoulder arthroplasty outcomes. This issue is a limiting factor in systematic reviews. Core outcome set (COS) methodology could address this problem by delineating a minimum set of outcomes for measurement in all shoulder arthroplasty trials.
Methods: A ClinicalTrials.gov search yielded 114 results. Eligible trials were coded on the following characteristics: study status, study type, arthroplasty type, sample size, measured outcomes, outcome measurement device, specific metric of measurement, method of aggregation, outcome classification, and adverse events.
Results: Sixty-six trials underwent data abstraction and data synthesis. Following abstraction, 383 shoulder arthroplasty outcomes were organized into 11 outcome domains. The most commonly reported outcomes were shoulder outcome score (n = 58), pain (n = 33), and quality of life (n = 15). The most common measurement devices were the Constant-Murley Shoulder Outcome Score (n = 38) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (n = 33). Temporal patterns of outcome use was also found.
Conclusion: Our study suggests the need for greater standardization of outcomes and instruments. The lack of consistency across trials indicates that developing a core outcome set for shoulder arthroplasty trials would be worthwhile. Such standardization would allow for more effective comparison across studies in systematic reviews, while at the same time consider important outcomes that may be underrepresented otherwise. This review of outcomes provides an evidence-based foundation for the development of a COS for shoulder arthroplasty.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures


Similar articles
-
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tear without glenohumeral arthritis.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Nov 3;92(15):2544-56. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00912. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010. PMID: 21048173
-
Rate of Improvement in Clinical Outcomes with Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Nov 1;99(21):1801-1811. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01387. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017. PMID: 29088034
-
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for failed shoulder arthroplasty.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Nov;21(11):1478-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.004. Epub 2012 Feb 22. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012. PMID: 22361717
-
A systematic review of outcomes in postoperative pain studies in paediatric and adolescent patients: towards development of a core outcome set.Anaesthesia. 2018 Mar;73(3):375-383. doi: 10.1111/anae.14211. Epub 2018 Jan 8. Anaesthesia. 2018. PMID: 29315467
-
Use of scoring systems for assessing and reporting the outcome results from shoulder surgery and arthroplasty.World J Orthop. 2015 Mar 18;6(2):244-51. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.244. eCollection 2015 Mar 18. World J Orthop. 2015. PMID: 25793164 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Defining the tipping point for primary shoulder arthroplasty.JSES Open Access. 2019 Nov 18;3(4):273-277. doi: 10.1016/j.jses.2019.09.009. eCollection 2019 Dec. JSES Open Access. 2019. PMID: 31891025 Free PMC article.
-
Outcome Selection and Methodological Quality of Major and Minor Shoulder Surgery Studies: A Scoping Review.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Mar;477(3):606-619. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000578. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019. PMID: 30624315 Free PMC article.
-
How internal rotation is measured in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature.JSES Int. 2019 Dec 20;4(1):182-188. doi: 10.1016/j.jses.2019.10.109. eCollection 2020 Mar. JSES Int. 2019. PMID: 32544939 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Innovative technologies for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in Australia: Market access challenges and implications for patients, decision-makers, and manufacturers.J Mark Access Health Policy. 2022 Dec 6;11(1):2154420. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2022.2154420. eCollection 2023. J Mark Access Health Policy. 2022. PMID: 36506841 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Research progress of greater tubercle fixation and rotator cuff repair in humeral head replacement].Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Feb 15;34(2):266-269. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201902066. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020. PMID: 32030962 Free PMC article. Chinese.
References
-
- Killian ML, Cavinatto L, Galatz LM, Thomopoulos S. Recent advances in shoulder research. Arthritis Res & Ther. 2012;14 doi: 10.1186/ar3846 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Day JS, Lau E, Ong KL, Williams GR, Ramsey ML, Kurtz SM. Prevalence and projections of total shoulder and elbow arthroplasty in the United States to 2015. J Should Elbow Surg. 2010;19:1115–1120. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.02.009 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Izquierdo R, Voloshin I, Edwards S, Freehill MQ, Stanwood W, Wiater JM, et al. Treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18:375–382. doi: 10.5435/00124635-201006000-00010 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wiater JM, Fabing MH. Shoulder arthroplasty: prosthetic options and indications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009;17:415–425. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200907000-00002 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bohsali KI, Wirth MA, Rockwood CA. Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2006;88:2279–2292. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00125 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources