Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 1;110(4):329-340.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx231.

The Future of Radiobiology

Affiliations

The Future of Radiobiology

David G Kirsch et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. .

Abstract

Innovation and progress in radiation oncology depend on discovery and insights realized through research in radiation biology. Radiobiology research has led to fundamental scientific insights, from the discovery of stem/progenitor cells to the definition of signal transduction pathways activated by ionizing radiation that are now recognized as integral to the DNA damage response (DDR). Radiobiological discoveries are guiding clinical trials that test radiation therapy combined with inhibitors of the DDR kinases DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), ataxia telangiectasia related (ATR), and immune or cell cycle checkpoint inhibitors. To maintain scientific and clinical relevance, the field of radiation biology must overcome challenges in research workforce, training, and funding. The National Cancer Institute convened a workshop to discuss the role of radiobiology research and radiation biologists in the future scientific enterprise. Here, we review the discussions of current radiation oncology research approaches and areas of scientific focus considered important for rapid progress in radiation sciences and the continued contribution of radiobiology to radiation oncology and the broader biomedical research community.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Retuning the Radio in Radiobiology.
    Chmura SJ, Connell PP, Weichselbaum RR. Chmura SJ, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Apr 1;110(4):325-326. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx234. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018. PMID: 29126281 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Till JE, Mc CE.. A direct measurement of the radiation sensitivity of normal mouse bone marrow cells. Radiat Res. 1961;14:213–222.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3570892 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kastan MB, Zhan Q, el-Deiry WS et al. , A mammalian cell cycle checkpoint pathway utilizing p53 and GADD45 is defective in ataxia-telangiectasia. Cell. 1992;714:587–597.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(92)90593-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moding EJ, Kastan MB, Kirsch DG.. Strategies for optimizing the response of cancer and normal tissues to radiation. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013;127:526–542.http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrd4003 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Durante M, Cucinotta FA.. Heavy ion carcinogenesis and human space exploration. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;86:465–472.http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrc2391 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Williams JP, Brown SL, Georges GE et al. , Animal models for medical countermeasures to radiation exposure. Radiat Res. 2010;1734:557–578.http://dx.doi.org/10.1667/RR1880.1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types