Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Apr;9(2):118-126.
doi: 10.1177/1947603517741168. Epub 2017 Nov 10.

T2*-Mapping of Acetabular Cartilage in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement at 3 Tesla: Comparative Analysis with Arthroscopic Findings

Affiliations
Comparative Study

T2*-Mapping of Acetabular Cartilage in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement at 3 Tesla: Comparative Analysis with Arthroscopic Findings

Tobias Hesper et al. Cartilage. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of T2*-mapping for detecting acetabular cartilage damage in patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Design A total of 29 patients (17 females, 12 males, mean age 35.6 ± 12.8 years, mean body mass index 25.1 ± 4.1 kg/m2, 16 right hips) with symptomatic FAI underwent T2* MRI and subsequent hip arthroscopy. T2* values were obtained by region of interest analysis in seven radially reformatted planes around the femoral neck (anterior, anterior-superior, superior-anterior, superior, superior-posterior, posterior-superior, posterior). Intraoperatively, a modified Outerbridge classification was used for assessment of the cartilage status in each region. T2* values and intraoperative data were compared, and sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive values (NPV) and positive predictive values (PPV) as well as the correlation between T2*-mapping and intraoperative findings, were determined. The mean time interval between MRI and arthroscopy was 65.7 ± 48.0 days. Results Significantly higher T2* values were noted in arthroscopically normal evaluated cartilage than in regions with cartilage degeneration (mean T2* 25.6 ± 4.7 ms vs. 19.9 ± 4.5 ms; P < 0.001). With the intraoperative findings as a reference, sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV were 83.5%, 67.7%, 78.4% and 74.4%, respectively. The correlation between T2*-mapping and intraoperative cartilage status was moderate (ρ = -0.557; P < 0.001). Conclusions T2*-mapping enabled analysis of acetabular cartilage with appropriate correlation with intraoperative findings and promising results for sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV in this cohort. Our results emphasize the value of T2*-mapping for the diagnosis of hip joint cartilage pathologies in symptomatic FAI.

Keywords: FAI; MRI; T2*-mapping; arthroscopy; hip.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flowchart for study inclusion and exclusion.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
A 10 o’clock double-echo steady-state (DESS) reformat (A), an intraoperative view (B) of the corresponding region (arrows), and a 10 o’clock T2* map reformat (C) of a 15-year-old male patient with anterosuperior femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). T2* values were obtained using a region of interest (ROI) analysis in central and peripheral acetabular cartilage. The corresponding DESS reformat served as a guide to ensure ROI placement within cartilage boundaries. Note no cartilage degeneration was observed in this region, either with DESS MRI, intraoperative correlation or T2* relaxometry.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Double-echo steady-state (DESS) reformat (A), arthroscopic view (B) and T2* map reformat (C) of the same 15-year-old male patient with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) revealing acetabular rim cartilage delamination (arrow; hypointense zone in the DESS image; low T2* values) in the 1 o’clock region. The peripheral region was excluded from this analysis because T2* assessment cannot be performed in areas with severe cartilage loss.

References

    1. Leunig M, Ganz R. Femoroacetabular impingement. A common cause of hip complaints leading to arthrosis [in German]. Unfallchirurg. 2005;108:9-10, 12-7. - PubMed
    1. Ganz R, Leunig M, Leunig-Ganz K, Harris WH. The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an integrated mechanical concept. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:264-72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bittersohl B, Hosalkar HS, Hesper T, Tiderius CJ, Zilkens C, Krauspe R. Advanced imaging in femoroacetabular impingement: current state and future prospects. Front Surg. 2015;2:34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ho CP, Ommen ND, Bhatia S, Saroki AJ, Goljan P, Briggs KK, et al. Predictive value of 3-T magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing grade 3 and 4 chondral lesions in the hip. Arthroscopy. 2016;32:1808-13. - PubMed
    1. Zilkens C, Miese F, Kim YJ, Jager M, Mamisch TC, Hosalkar H, et al. Direct comparison of intra-articular versus intravenous delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of hip joint cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;39:94-102. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources