Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 10;19(1):247.
doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1451-5.

Failure to achieve lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) six months after diagnosis is associated with early damage accrual in Caucasian patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Affiliations

Failure to achieve lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) six months after diagnosis is associated with early damage accrual in Caucasian patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Matteo Piga et al. Arthritis Res Ther. .

Abstract

Background: The aim was to assess the attainability and outcome of the lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) in the early stages of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods: LLDAS prevalence was evaluated at 6 (T1) and 18 (T2) months after diagnosis and treatment initiation (T0) in a monocentric cohort of 107 (median disease duration 9.7 months) prospectively followed Caucasian patients with SLE. Reasons for failure to achieve LLDAS were also investigated. Multivariate models were built to identify factors associated with lack of LLDAS achievement and to investigate the relationship between LLDAS and Systemic Lupus International Collaboration Clinics (SLICC)/Damage Index (SDI) accrual.

Results: There were 47 (43.9%) patients in LLDAS at T1 and 48 (44.9%) at T2. The most frequent unmet LLDAS criterion was prednisolone dose >7.5 mg/day (83% of patients with no LLDAS at T1). Disease manifestations with the lowest remission rate during follow up were increased anti-double-stranded DNA (persistently present in 85.7% and 67.5% of cases at T1 and T2, respectively), low serum complement fractions (73.2% and 66.3%) and renal abnormalities (46.4% and 28.6%). Renal involvement at T0 was significantly associated with failure to achieve LLDAS both at T1 (OR 7.8, 95% CI 1.4-43.4; p = 0.019) and T2 (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.4-10.6; p = 0.008). Presence of any organ damage (SDI ≥1) at T2 was significantly associated with lack of LLDAS at T1 (OR 5.0, 95% CI 1.5-16.6; p = 0.009) and older age at diagnosis (OR 1.05 per year, 95% CI 1.01-1.09; p = 0.020).

Conclusion: LLDAS is a promising treatment target in the early stages of SLE, being attainable and negatively associated with damage accrual, but it fit poorly to patients with renal involvement.

Keywords: Disease activity; Outcomes research; Systemic lupus erythematosus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors’ information

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from local Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria of Cagliari Ethics Committee and all participants gave their written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Consent for publication was obtained.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Analysis of the main causes of lack of lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) achievement. SLEDAI-2K, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity 2000; PGA, physician global assessment; PDN, prednisolone (or equivalent)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Patients who were in lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) and patients who were not in LLDAS (no-LLDAS) at 18 months (T2). Persistent LLDAS, patients who were in LLDAS at 6 months (T1) and at T2; No-LLDAS → LLDAS, patients who achieved LLDAS within the T1–T2 interval; Persistent no-LLDAS, patients who never achieved LLDAS; No-LLDAS ← LLDAS, patients who were in LLDAS at T1 but not at T2
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Frequency (percentage) of manifestations still identified at 18 months (T2) and respective remission rate. Purple, frequency (percentage) of manifestations recorded at T0 and still present at T2. Dark blue, manifestations that were in remission at 6 months (T1). Light blue, manifestations that were recorded as in remission for the first time at T2. Below the bars the global remission rate is reported

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cervera R, Abarca-Costalago M, Abramovicz D, Allegri F, Annunziata P, Aydintug AO, et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus in Europe at the change of the millennium: lessons from the “Euro-Lupus Project”. Autoimmun Rev. 2006;5:180–6. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2005.06.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barr SG, Zonana-Nacach A, Magder LS, Petri M. Patterns of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42:2682–8. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199912)42:12<2682::AID-ANR26>3.0.CO;2-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Steri M, Orrù V, Idda ML, Pitzalis M, Pala M, Zara I, et al. Overexpression of the cytokine BAFF and autoimmunity risk. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1615–26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610528. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Doria A, Iaccarino L, La Montagna G, Mathieu A, Piga M, Galeazzi M, et al. Clinical profile and direct medical cost of care of adults presenting with systemic lupus erythematosus in Italy. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015;33:375–84. - PubMed
    1. Thomas G, Mancini J, Jourde-Chiche N, Sarlon G, Amoura Z, Harlé JR, et al. Mortality associated with systemic lupus erythematosus in France assessed by multiple-cause-of-death analysis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66:2503–11. doi: 10.1002/art.38731. - DOI - PubMed