Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 10;17(1):712.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2668-3.

Expectations towards participation in easily accessible pain management interventions: a qualitative study

Torunn Hatlen Nøst  1   2 , Aslak Steinsbekk  3 , Liv Riseth  3   4 , Ola Bratås  3   5 , Kjersti Grønning  3   5
Affiliations

Expectations towards participation in easily accessible pain management interventions: a qualitative study

Torunn Hatlen Nøst et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: People with chronic pain use a range of healthcare services, but they also report a high degree of dissatisfaction with treatments. One reason for dissatisfaction might be participants' expectations towards treatments. The aim of this study was to explore expectations of people with chronic pain towards participation in easily accessible pain management interventions delivered in public primary care.

Methods: A qualitative study using semi-structured individual face-to-face interviews with 21 informants. The informants were recruited among participants enrolled in a randomised controlled trial on the effect of an easily accessible self-management course for people with chronic pain. The data were analysed thematically using Systematic Text Condensation.

Results: Having experienced pain for a long time, there was no specific expectation of a cure or a significant alleviation of the pain. The informants' expectations mainly concerned a hope that participation could lead to a better everyday life. The informants said that hope was important as it motivated them to keep going and continue self-care activities. The hope acted as a driving force towards trying new interventions and maintaining motivation to do activities they experienced as beneficial. Both concrete aspects of the current intervention and an understanding of what interventions in general could offer contributed to the informants hope. The expectations centred about the interventions being something new, as they had not previously tried this service, an opportunity to gain and reinforce skills, to help them continue to grow as a person, to meet others in similar situations, and to access professional support in an easy manner. Participating in interventions provided by healthcare services was seen by some as an act of self-care, where they did something active to manage their health.

Conclusions: Expectations towards the interventions were related to a hope for participation leading to a better everyday life. The role of hope for peoples' motivation to self-care implies that service providers should be aware of and help to maintain hope for a better everyday life. The importance of social support as part of self-care should be acknowledged when developing interventions targeting chronic pain.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02531282 . Registered on August 21 2015.

Keywords: Chronic pain; Expectation; Health services accessibility; Primary health care; Qualitative research; Self-care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All informants signed an informed consent form after having received oral and written information to enable them to make an informed choice about participation. Those who participated in the qualitative study in addition to the RCT signed an additional consent form regarding the interviews. The informants were informed that participation in the qualitative study was voluntary and not a pre-requisite to trial participation. The trial has obtained approval from the director for health and social affairs in the municipality, and from the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics (REK) (2015/ 1030/ REK sørøst).

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
An overview of the informants’ previous experiences of living with chronic pain and the type of services they have used
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006;10(4):287–333. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Loeser JD, Melzack R. Pain: an overview. Lancet. 1999;353(9164):1607–1609. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01311-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Landmark T, Romundstad P, Dale O, Borchgrevink PC, Vatten L, Kaasa S. Chronic pain: one year prevalence and associated characteristics (the HUNT pain study) Scan J Pain. 2013;4(4):182–187. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2013.07.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. O'Brien T, Breivik H. The impact of chronic pain-European patients’ perspective over 12 months. Scan J Pain. 2012;3(1):23–29. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2011.11.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lohne V, Heer HC, Andersen M, Miaskowski C, Kongerud J, Rustoen T. Qualitative study of pain of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Heart Lung. 2010;39(3):226–234. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2009.08.002. - DOI - PubMed

Associated data