An international, cross-sectional survey of the management of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures around total hip arthroplasties
- PMID: 29126601
- DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.10.034
An international, cross-sectional survey of the management of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures around total hip arthroplasties
Abstract
Introduction: The incidence of periprosthetic femoral fractures around total hip arthroplasties is increasing. Fractures around a stable implant stem (Vancouver type B1) are among the most common of these fractures. Various fixation strategies for Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic fractures have been reported in the literature; however, little high-level evidence exists. This study was designed to determine the current management strategies and opinions among orthopaedic surgeons treating Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures, and to evaluate the need for a large prospective randomized controlled trial for the management of these injuries.
Methods: Orthopaedic surgeon members of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA), the Canadian Orthopaedic Association (COA), and the Hip Society were invited to participate in a 51-item web-based survey surrounding the management of periprosthetic femoral fractures around total hip replacements, as well as the perceived need for future research in this area. Responses were summarized using proportions, and further stratified by practice type, case volume, surgeon age, and fellowship training.
Results: For Vancouver type B1 fractures, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with locked plating was favoured slightly over ORIF with cable plating ± cortical strut allograft (51.1% versus 45.5%). When compared to cable plating with cortical strut allograft, respondents believed that isolated locked plating resulted in lower nonunion and reoperation rates, but similar infection and malunion rates. Subgroup analyses revealed that practice type, surgeon age, case volume, and fellowship training influenced surgeons' management of periprosthetic femoral fractures and beliefs regarding complications. There is high demand for a large prospective randomized controlled trial for Vancouver type B1 fracture fixation.
Conclusions: Consensus surrounding the management of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures is lacking, and there is a perceived need among orthopaedic surgeons for a large prospective randomized controlled trial in order to define the optimal management of these injuries.
Keywords: Locking plate; Periprosthetic fracture; Strut allograft; Survey; Total hip arthroplasty; Vancouver type B1.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
High union rates of locking compression plating with cortical strut allograft for type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures.Int Orthop. 2016 Nov;40(11):2365-2371. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-3107-x. Epub 2016 Jan 13. Int Orthop. 2016. PMID: 26759257
-
Locking compression plate fixation of Vancouver type-B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Sep;89(9):1964-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01224. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007. PMID: 17768193
-
[Treatment of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture with locked plate and xenogenic bony plate].Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2016 Aug 25;29(8):734-737. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2016.08.012. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2016. PMID: 29282933 Chinese.
-
Locking plate fixation for Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a critical analysis of 135 cases.J Orthop Sci. 2013 May;18(3):426-36. doi: 10.1007/s00776-013-0359-4. Epub 2013 Feb 19. J Orthop Sci. 2013. PMID: 23420340 Review.
-
Principles of treatment for periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures around well-fixed total hip arthroplasty.J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009 Nov;17(11):677-88. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200911000-00002. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009. PMID: 19880678 Review.
Cited by
-
Does an additional attachment plate improve fixation in Vancouver type B1 and C periprosthetic femoral fractures? A retrospective comparative study.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 May 22;26(1):505. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08762-1. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025. PMID: 40405191 Free PMC article.
-
Who Is Treating Periprosthetic Femur Fractures? An Analysis of the Periprosthetic Research Consortium.Arthroplast Today. 2024 Aug 13;29:101428. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101428. eCollection 2024 Oct. Arthroplast Today. 2024. PMID: 39228911 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment algorithm in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fractures: osteosynthesis vs revision arthroplasty.EFORT Open Rev. 2022 Aug 4;7(8):533-541. doi: 10.1530/EOR-21-0129. EFORT Open Rev. 2022. PMID: 35924638 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biomechanical models: key considerations in study design.OTA Int. 2021 Apr 15;4(2 Suppl):e099(1-6). doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000099. eCollection 2021 Apr. OTA Int. 2021. PMID: 37608858 Free PMC article.
-
Atypical periprosthetic femoral fracture associated with long-term bisphosphonate therapy.J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Sep 15;15(1):414. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01941-x. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020. PMID: 32933566 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical