Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jan:64:13-21.
doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 9.

Wearable activity monitors in oncology trials: Current use of an emerging technology

Affiliations
Review

Wearable activity monitors in oncology trials: Current use of an emerging technology

Gillian Gresham et al. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Physical activity is an important outcome in oncology trials. Physical activity is commonly assessed using self-reported questionnaires, which are limited by recall and response biases. Recent advancements in wearable technology have provided oncologists with new opportunities to obtain real-time, objective physical activity data. The purpose of this review was to describe current uses of wearable activity monitors in oncology trials.

Methods: We searched Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for oncology trials involving wearable activity monitors published between 2005 and 2016. We extracted details on study design, types of activity monitors used, and purpose for their use. We summarized activity monitor metrics including step counts, sleep and sedentary time, and time spent in moderate-to-vigorous activity.

Results: We identified 41 trials of which 26 (63%) involved cancer survivors (post-treatment) and 15 trials (37%) involved patients with active cancer. Most trials (65%) involved breast cancer patients. Wearable activity monitors were commonly used in exercise (54%) or behavioral (29%) trials. Cancer survivors take between 4660 and 11,000 steps/day and those undergoing treatment take 2885 to 8300steps/day.

Conclusion: Wearable activity monitors are increasingly being used to obtain objective measures of physical activity in oncology trials. There is potential for their use to expand to evaluate and predict clinical outcomes such as survival, quality of life, and treatment tolerance in future studies. Currently, there remains a lack of standardization in the types of monitors being used and how their data are being collected, analyzed, and interpreted.

Precis: Recent advancements in wearable activity monitor technology have provided oncologists with new opportunities to monitor their patients' daily activity in real-world settings. The integration of wearable activity monitors into cancer care will help increase our understanding of the associations between physical activity and the prevention and management of the disease, in addition to other important cancer outcomes.

Keywords: Cancer; Cancer survivorship; Oncology trials; Outcome assessment; Physical activity; Wearable activity monitors; Wearable technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

All authors of the manuscript report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Study selection flowchart.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Number of cancer trials involving wearable activity monitors, by year published.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Reported baseline step counts* from clinical trials using wearable activity monitors. *Steps per day are the average number of steps taken each day. Horizontal line indicates the recommended 10,000 steps per day average. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

References

    1. Warburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS, Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence, Can. Med. Assoc. J 174 (6) (2006) 801–809. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schrack JA, Gresham G, Wanigatunga AA, Understanding physical activity in cancer patients and survivors: new methodology, new challenges, and new opportunities, Mol. Case Stud (2017) mcs. a001933. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Matthews CE, Hagstromer M, Pober DM, Bowles HR, Best practices for using physical activity monitors in population-based research, Med. Sci. Sports Exerc 44 (1 Suppl 1) (2012) S68–76. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adams SA, Matthews CE, Ebbeling CB, Moore CG, Cunningham JE, Fulton J, Hebert JR, The effect of social desirability and social approval on self-reports of physical activity, Am. J. Epidemiol 161 (4) (2005) 389–398. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dobkin BH, Wearable motion sensors to continuously measure real-world physical activities, Curr. Opin. Neurol 26 (6) (2013) 602–608. - PMC - PubMed