Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Mar;199(3):812-822.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.045. Epub 2017 Nov 9.

Effect of Sperm Morphology on Pregnancy Success via Intrauterine Insemination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effect of Sperm Morphology on Pregnancy Success via Intrauterine Insemination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Taylor P Kohn et al. J Urol. 2018 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: Men with abnormal sperm morphology are often counseled that natural conception and intrauterine insemination are ineffective, and in vitro fertilization is the only option. Our objective was to determine the effect of sperm morphology on the pregnancy success of intrauterine insemination.

Materials and methods: We systematically searched for studies published prior to January 2017 that 1) reported ultrasound verified clinical pregnancies per intrauterine insemination cycle, 2) assessed sperm morphology using the Kruger strict criteria and 3) described morphology at the greater than 4% and 4% or less and/or the 1% or greater and less than 1% thresholds. In all studies mean female age was between 25 and 40 years and mean total motile sperm count was greater than 10 million. Estimates were pooled using random effects meta-analysis.

Results: Data were extracted from 20 observational studies involving a total of 41,018 cycles. When comparing men at the greater than 4% and 4% or less thresholds, the rate of ultrasound verified pregnancy per intrauterine insemination cycle was not statistically or clinically different (14.2% vs 12.1%, p = 0.06) and the risk difference was 3.0% (95% CI 1.4-4.6), indicating 3.0 additional pregnancies per 100 intrauterine insemination cycles. When comparing men at the 1% or greater and the less than 1% thresholds, there were no statistical or clinical differences in the rate of ultrasound verified pregnancy per cycle of intrauterine insemination (14.0% vs 13.9%, p = 0.97) or in the risk difference (1.6%, 95% CI -4.5-7.6).

Conclusions: There appears to be no clinical difference in intrauterine insemination pregnancy success among men with normal and abnormal sperm morphology when accounting for total motile sperm count and female age. Abnormal sperm morphology alone should not exclude couples from attempting intrauterine insemination.

Keywords: artificial; homologous; infertility; insemination; male; semen analysis; spermatozoa; testis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Editorial Comment.
    Smith R. Smith R. J Urol. 2018 Mar;199(3):821-822. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.124. Epub 2017 Dec 20. J Urol. 2018. PMID: 29272708 No abstract available.
  • Editorial Comment.
    Ohl DA, Dupree JM, Jensen CFS. Ohl DA, et al. J Urol. 2018 Mar;199(3):821. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.123. Epub 2017 Dec 20. J Urol. 2018. PMID: 29272709 No abstract available.