Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 13;8(1):1459.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01669-z.

Dengue virus-reactive CD8+ T cells mediate cross-protection against subsequent Zika virus challenge

Affiliations

Dengue virus-reactive CD8+ T cells mediate cross-protection against subsequent Zika virus challenge

Jinsheng Wen et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Zika virus (ZIKV) and dengue virus (DENV) are antigenically related flaviviruses that share cross-reactivity in antibody and T cell responses, and co-circulate in increasing numbers of countries. Whether pre-existing DENV immunity can cross-protect or enhance ZIKV infection during sequential infection of the same host is unknown. Here, we show that DENV-immune Ifnar1 -/- or wild-type C57BL/6 mice infected with ZIKV have cross-reactive immunity to subsequent ZIKV infection and pathogenesis. Adoptive transfer and cell depletion studies demonstrate that DENV-immune CD8+ T cells predominantly mediate cross-protective responses to ZIKV. In contrast, passive transfer studies suggest that DENV-immune serum does not protect against ZIKV infection. Thus, CD8+ T cell immunity generated during primary DENV infection can confer protection against secondary ZIKV infection in mice. Further optimization of current DENV vaccines for T cell responses might confer cross-protection and prevent antibody-mediated enhancement of ZIKV infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that M.S.D. is a consultant for Inbios, Visterra, Aviana, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals and on the Scientific Advisory Boards of Moderna and OvaGene. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
ZIKV tissue burden in DENV-immune Ifnar1 −/− mice in the presence or absence of CD8+ T cells. Ifnar1 −/− mice were immunized intraperitoneally with DENV2 (2 × 102 FFU) for 28 days. Naive and DENV2-immune mice were injected intraperitoneally with isotype control Ab and anti-mouse CD8 Ab at 3 days and 1 day before ZIKV challenge. Three days post ZIKV challenge, peptide-specific CD3+CD8+IFNγ+ T cells (ad; a, c naive mice; b, d DENV2-immune mice) and infectious ZIKV levels in sera (e) and indicated organs (fi) were detected using ICS assay and FFA, respectively. Data were pooled from two independent experiments with n = 3–5 mice per group per experiment and expressed as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. A Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA was used for ad while two-tailed Mann–Whitney test was used for ei. Supplementary Tables 1 and 2 provide exact values of n and p
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The effect of DENV2-immune sera on ZIKV infection in vitro and in Ifnar1 −/− mice. Ifnar1 −/− mice were immunized intraperitoneally with DENV2 (2 × 102 FFU) for 28 days. Naive Ifnar1 −/− mouse sera (n = 10) and DENV2-immune Ifnar1 −/− mouse sera (n = 10) were examined for their ability to neutralize DENV2 or ZIKV using U937 DC-SIGN cells and a flow cytometry-based neutralization assay (a). Data were pooled from two independent experiments with n = 5 mouse sera per group and expressed as mean ± SEM. Different volumes of naive and DENV2-immune Ifnar1 −/− mouse sera were passively transferred (retro-orbital route) to naive recipient Ifnar1 −/− mice (b, c). Three days post retro-orbital challenge with 1 × 104 FFU of ZIKV FSS13025, viral burdens in sera and indicated organs were measured using FFA. In b, data are pooled from two independent experiments (n = 3–4 mice per group per experiment), while results in c represent one experiment. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. **p < 0.01. b A Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA. c Two-tailed Mann–Whitney test. Supplementary Tables 1 and 2 provide exact values of n and p
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Reduced ZIKV burden in Ifnar1 −/− mice adoptively transferred with DENV2-exposed CD8+ T cells. Naive (1 × 107) and DENV2-exposed CD8+ T cells (1 × 107) from Ifnar1 −/− mice were adoptively transferred to naive recipient Ifnar1 −/− mice. Three days post ZIKV challenge (1 × 104 FFU of ZIKV FSS13025, retro-orbital route), cross-reactive peptide-specific CD8+ T cell responses (a) and ZIKV levels in sera and indicated organs (b) were detected by ICS assay and FFA, respectively. Data are pooled from two independent experiments (n = 3–4 mice per group per experiment) and expressed as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001,****p < 0.0001. a A Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA. b Two-tailed Mann–Whitney test. Supplementary Tables 1 and 2 provide exact values of n and p
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Reduced ZIKV burden in WT mice adoptively transferred with DENV2-exposed CD8+ T cells. Naive or DENV2-exposed CD8+ T cells (1 × 107) from WT mice were adoptively transferred to naive recipient WT mice that were intraperitoneally injected with 2 mg of the IFNAR1-blocking mAb MAR1-5A3 1 day before ZIKV challenge. Three days post ZIKV challenge (1 × 106 FFU of FSS13025, retro-orbital route), cross-reactive peptide-specific CD8+ T cell responses (a) and ZIKV levels in serum and liver (b) were detected by ICS assay and FFA, respectively. Data are pooled from two independent experiments (n = 4–6 mice per group per experiment) and expressed as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. a A Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA. b Two-tailed Mann–Whitney test. Supplementary Tables 1 and 2 give exact values of n and p
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Decreased ZIKV-induced morbidity and mortality in Ifnar1 −/− mice adoptively transferred with DENV2-exposed CD8+ T cells. Naive or DENV2-exposed CD8+ T cells (1 × 107) from Ifnar1 −/− mice were adoptively transferred via the retro-orbital route to recipient Ifnar1 −/− mice. One day later, mice were retro-orbitally challenged with 1 × 103 FFU of ZIKV FSS13025. Clinical score (a, b), weight loss (c), and survival rates (d) were recorded daily. Mice having >20% weight loss and/or exhibiting paralysis of two hind limbs were euthanized according to Animal Protocols. This experiment was performed twice with n = 5 mice per group per experiment. Data represent pooled data from 10 mice per group and expressed as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. c Two-way ANOVA. d Log rank test. Supplementary Tables 1 and 2 give exact values of n and p

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ioos S, et al. Current Zika virus epidemiology and recent epidemics. Med. Mal. Infect. 2014;44:302–307. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2014.04.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carlson CJ, Dougherty ER, Getz W. An ecological assessment of the pandemic threat of Zika virus. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016;10:e0004968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004968. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ikejezie J, et al. Zika virus transmission—region of the Americas, May 15, 2015-December 15, 2016. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2017;66:329–334. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6612a4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dupont-Rouzeyrol M, et al. Co-infection with Zika and dengue viruses in 2 patients, New Caledonia, 2014. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2015;2:381–382. doi: 10.3201/eid2102.141553. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barba-Spaeth G, et al. Structural basis of potent Zika-dengue virus antibody cross-neutralization. Nature. 2016;536:48–53. doi: 10.1038/nature18938. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms