Predictors of adverse psychological experiences surrounding genome-wide profiling for disease risk
- PMID: 29130150
- PMCID: PMC6002310
- DOI: 10.1007/s12687-017-0339-z
Predictors of adverse psychological experiences surrounding genome-wide profiling for disease risk
Abstract
This study aimed to identify predictors of adverse psychological experiences among direct-to-consumer (DTC) genomic test consumers. We performed a secondary analysis on data from the Scripps Genomic Health Initiative (SGHI), which studied 2037 individuals tested with commercially available tests yielding personalized risk estimates for 23 common, genetically complex diseases. As part of the original study, the participants completed baseline and follow-up survey measures assessing demographics, personal and family health history, attitudes toward genetic testing, anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)), test-related distress (Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R)), and reactions to receipt of results. To further describe the participants who had an adverse psychological outcome, this secondary analysis defined two different variables ("distress response" and "psychologically sensitive participants") and examined their relationship to various demographic variables and other survey responses. One hundred thirty participants (6.4%) were defined as having a "distress response" to receipt of results based on changes in STAI and/or IES. Four hundred thirty-one participants (21.2%) were defined as being "psychologically sensitive" based on high STAI scores both pre- and post-receipt of results. For psychologically sensitive subjects, younger age emerged as a predictor (p < 0.0005). Family history and personal history were only significant predictors for Alzheimer's disease in the psychologically sensitive participants (p = .03) and restless leg syndrome in those with a distress response (p = .03). Psychologically sensitive participants were more likely to indicate a number of pre-test concerns than were controls, but neither group of participants were any more likely to follow up with their physician or a free genetic counseling service after the return of results.
Keywords: Anxiety; Depression; Direct-to-consumer; Genetic testing; Genomic risk assessment; Impact of events; Personalized medicine; Precision medicine; Psychological distress.
Conflict of interest statement
Kelly Ormond was a paid consultant for Navigenics in 2007–2009, during which time the original SGHI data was obtained, but she was not involved in the creation or oversight of the original Bloss et al. (2011) study or its data in any way.
Similar articles
-
Influence of individual differences in disease perception on consumer response to direct-to-consumer genomic testing.Clin Genet. 2015 Mar;87(3):225-32. doi: 10.1111/cge.12419. Epub 2014 Jun 6. Clin Genet. 2015. PMID: 24798746 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of direct-to-consumer genomic testing at long term follow-up.J Med Genet. 2013 Jun;50(6):393-400. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-101207. Epub 2013 Apr 4. J Med Genet. 2013. PMID: 23559530
-
Psychological distress after physical injury: a one-year follow-up study of conscious hospitalised patients.Injury. 2014 Jan;45(1):289-98. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.10.001. Epub 2012 Oct 24. Injury. 2014. PMID: 23103082
-
Direct-to-consumer personal genome testing and cancer risk prediction.Cancer J. 2012 Jul-Aug;18(4):293-302. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3182610e38. Cancer J. 2012. PMID: 22846729 Review.
-
Behavioural changes, sharing behaviour and psychological responses after receiving direct-to-consumer genetic test results: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Community Genet. 2018 Jan;9(1):1-18. doi: 10.1007/s12687-017-0310-z. Epub 2017 Jun 29. J Community Genet. 2018. PMID: 28664264 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Attitudes on pharmacogenetic testing in psychiatric patients with treatment-resistant depression.Depress Anxiety. 2020 Sep;37(9):842-850. doi: 10.1002/da.23074. Epub 2020 Jul 15. Depress Anxiety. 2020. PMID: 32667102 Free PMC article.
-
Physicians' perspectives on receiving unsolicited genomic results.Genet Med. 2019 Feb;21(2):311-318. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0047-z. Epub 2018 Jul 5. Genet Med. 2019. PMID: 29904163 Free PMC article.
-
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Data Privacy: Key Concerns and Recommendations Based on Consumer Perspectives.J Pers Med. 2019 May 9;9(2):25. doi: 10.3390/jpm9020025. J Pers Med. 2019. PMID: 31075859 Free PMC article.
-
Disclosure of Genetic Risk Factors for Alzheimer's Disease to Cognitively Healthy Individuals-From Current Practice towards a Personalised Medicine Scenario.Biomedicines. 2022 Dec 8;10(12):3177. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10123177. Biomedicines. 2022. PMID: 36551936 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A randomized controlled trial of analogue pharmacogenomic testing feedback for psychotropic medications.PEC Innov. 2022 Dec 16;2:100119. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100119. eCollection 2023 Dec. PEC Innov. 2022. PMID: 37214496 Free PMC article.
References
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials